Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE shall determine whether the calculations of baseline GHG emissions or baseline net GHG removals, project GHG emissions or actual net GHG removals, and leakage GHG emissions have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the registered monitoring plan (VVS-PA ver. 01 paragraph 376 (c).
The emission reduction calculation spreadsheet (workbook “ER calculations”) shows that the individual WTG electricity exports/imports data is sourced from the JMR whereas the monitoring report (page 7) indicates that the data will be from apportioning procedure. The PP/DOE to clarify.

2: The DOE shall list each parameter required by the registered monitoring plan and state how it verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring report (VVS-PA ver. 01 paragraph 367)
The PP/DOE are requested to address the following inconsistencies:
(i) The monitoring report (page 6) indicates that the PP has entered into agreement with WTG supplier (Suzlon) to provide the generation data whereas the verification report (page 14) indicates that the PP has no control over this process.
(ii) The monitoring report (page 7) indicates that the electricity exported from each WTG (EGexp) and imported by each WTG (EGimp) is calculated based on apportioning. However, the verification report (page 14) indicates that EGexp/EGimp are recorded by an energy meter installed at the sub-station.