Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: In doing so, the DOE shall report the relevant dates for the project activity (e.g. construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc). In addition, please report the period of overhaul times or downtime of equipments due to preventive maintenance in the plant.

2: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The DOE shall report that how it has verified all the default factors listed in the revised PDD dated 07/12/2010.

3: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: Please clarify that how DOE verified the gaps in calibration for instrument calciner Meter (Bunker & Residual Oils) which was used to monitor parameter QFF (Fuel type) from 16/01/09 to 20/01/09 and 16/03/09 to 16/04/09.