Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification and certification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the revised monitoring plan as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 392.
Issue: The DOE is requested how it confirmed that the registered monitoring plan has been properly implemented. The monitoring plan requires the sampling for Pn,i,,y and FCresidual be carried out four times per year at minimum. However the verification report pages 12 and 17 show that in 2013 the sampling was carried out only three times (05/03/2013, 02/07/2013, 23/10/2013 for Pn,i,y and 27/03/2013, 20/06/2013, 22/10/2013 for FCresidual).

2: Scope: The verification and certification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved nor/or confirm that appropriate methods and formulae for calculating baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage have been followed as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 403 (c) and 409 (j).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it concluded that the methods and formulae for calculating the baseline GHG emissions have been followed, in particular for the calculation of BECH,SWDS,y. The spreadsheet shows that during this monitoring period, 151 days (01/01/201 - 28/05/2013 or approximately 5 months) were considered for x=3. However, the second and third monitoring periods show period of 01/07/2012 - 31/12/2012 (or 6 months) for x=3. Hence there are only 11 months considered for x=3.

3: Scope: The verification and certification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 403 (d).
Issue: The DOE is requested how it has verified the GWP of CH4 and N2O as per the “Standard for application of the global warming potentials to CDM PA and PoA for the second commitment period of the
Kyoto protocol” Version 1.0 (EB 69 Annex 3).