09:05 24 Apr 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
The DOE shall further validate the compliance of the monitoring conducted in accordance with the registered PDD.
The PP/DOE are requested to address the issues below as per paragraphs 365, 366 and 371 of the VVS-PA ver.2.
a) The DOE shall further validate the calibration of monitoring equipment considering that the PDD p.27 and MR p.10 have the provision that annual calibration testing is scheduled to be performed by an independent third party, whereas the actual calibration has been conducted every two years.
b) There is a lack of information about the "actual errors" of meters identified in the delayed calibration test and what the "maximum permissible error" is. Although the Verification Report p.16, confirms that the maximum errors of meters are within ±0.4%, without having this additional information, it is not able to confirm the compliance of the provisions specified in the VVS-PA ver. 2 paragraph 366 (a) and (b).
The DOE shall further validate the compliance of the monitoring conducted in accordance with the registered PDD.
The PP/DOE are requested to address the issues below as per paragraphs 365, 366 and 371 of the VVS-PA ver.2.
a) The DOE shall further validate the calibration of monitoring equipment considering that the PDD p.27 and MR p.10 have the provision that annual calibration testing is scheduled to be performed by an independent third party, whereas the actual calibration has been conducted every two years.
b) There is a lack of information about the "actual errors" of meters identified in the delayed calibration test and what the "maximum permissible error" is. Although the Verification Report p.16, confirms that the maximum errors of meters are within ±0.4%, without having this additional information, it is not able to confirm the compliance of the provisions specified in the VVS-PA ver. 2 paragraph 366 (a) and (b).
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: