23:49 26 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (i) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status (e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) of the project activity inline with the requirement of EB48, Annex 68, paragraph 10(a)(i) and EB54 Annex 34.
2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVM v.1.2 para 206 & 221(d))
Issue: The DOE is requested to clarify how the measurement of alternative fuels consumption other than rice husk is in line with the approved revised monitoring plan and applied methodology given that the fuel consumption is calculated using a formula given in the MR (page 14).
3: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The emission factor of the residual fuel oil in the approved revised monitoring plan is 73.33 tCO2/TJ but different residual oil (mixed oil and automotive oil) with the emission factors (73.33 tCO2/TJ and 85.0 tCO2/TJ) are used in the emission reduction calculation.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The calibration frequency of Entrance Scale (C-601-29-002) and Exit Scale (C-601-29-001) used to measure the parameter QAF and CTAF is inconsistent in page 15 and 23 of MR.
5: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified the compliance of EB52, Annex 60 for the delay in the calibration of the measuring equipment Calciner Meter (C-205-45-001) for the period 17/08/09-20/08/09 (4 days), 01/12/09-06/12/09 (6 days), 05/02/09-10/02/10 (6 days); Kiln meter (C-205-45-002) for the period 01/04/10-30/04/10 (30 days) and Humidity scale (C-501-10-031) for the period 11/03/10-16/03/10 (6 days).
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (i) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status (e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) of the project activity inline with the requirement of EB48, Annex 68, paragraph 10(a)(i) and EB54 Annex 34.
2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVM v.1.2 para 206 & 221(d))
Issue: The DOE is requested to clarify how the measurement of alternative fuels consumption other than rice husk is in line with the approved revised monitoring plan and applied methodology given that the fuel consumption is calculated using a formula given in the MR (page 14).
3: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The emission factor of the residual fuel oil in the approved revised monitoring plan is 73.33 tCO2/TJ but different residual oil (mixed oil and automotive oil) with the emission factors (73.33 tCO2/TJ and 85.0 tCO2/TJ) are used in the emission reduction calculation.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The calibration frequency of Entrance Scale (C-601-29-002) and Exit Scale (C-601-29-001) used to measure the parameter QAF and CTAF is inconsistent in page 15 and 23 of MR.
5: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified the compliance of EB52, Annex 60 for the delay in the calibration of the measuring equipment Calciner Meter (C-205-45-001) for the period 17/08/09-20/08/09 (4 days), 01/12/09-06/12/09 (6 days), 05/02/09-10/02/10 (6 days); Kiln meter (C-205-45-002) for the period 01/04/10-30/04/10 (30 days) and Humidity scale (C-501-10-031) for the period 11/03/10-16/03/10 (6 days).
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: