Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain a confirmation whether the temporary deviation from the registered monitoring plan or applied methodology does not require prior approval of the Board and the provisions of Appendix 1 of PS apply to those deviations (VVS v2, para 252)
Issue: The DOE is requested to further explain how the temporary deviation complies with the Appendix I of the Project Standard version 03 paragraph 3. In particular, how the approach used to determine the electricity import for Hapugastenne II from January 2007 to June 2008, Hulluganga I& II from January 2007, can be considered as the source of the GHG operating at maximum capacity.

2: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports (VVS v2, para 236, 284 (e)).
issue: The DOE is requested to further explain a) the reason why the import electricity readings coming from the installed bi-directional meters have not been presented in the spreadsheet and b) how it verified the import electricity for Hapugastenne I from January 2007 to December 2007, for Hapugastenne II from January 2007 to August 2008 and Hulluganga I & II units from January 2007 to September 2008. In doing so, the DOE shall explain why the import electricity remained the same (960 MWh each month for Hapugastenne I, 392 MWh each month for Hapugastenne II and 798 MWh each month for Hulluganga I & II units) for aforementioned periods.