Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: For each monitoring period, the actual operation of the registered CDM project activity. Please refer to VVS PA v1.0 paragraph 359.
The DOE is requested to further substantiate how it has verified the actual operation of the project activity, in particular, how the PP excluded the emission reductions during the operational events. For example, in page 8 of the monitoring report, there are around 9 hours Maintenance of facilities.(04:59-13:54), the PP states that "Flow rate and CH4 concentration data is not available due to measurement error. Excluded for estimation of emission reduction", whereas in the Excel spreadsheet, based on row 3730 to row 3754, it is not clear how these hours are excluded from the emission reductions calculation.

2: The DOE shall list each parameter required by the registered monitoring plan and state how it verified the information flow (from data generation, aggregation, to recording, calculation and reporting) for these parameters including the values in the monitoring report. Please refer to VVS PA v1.0 paragraph 367.
The PP/DOE is requested to further substantiate how the watt hour meters Wa and Wc are used to monitor the power generation by the LFG generators and how the double counting, if any, can be avoided. In particular, it is observed that as per the ER spreadsheet (e.g. P470/471, Z466/467, T722/723, etc of sheet ELexp), both meter readings of Wa and Wc are considered in the same hour, whereas the Wa meter reading may already include Wc readings based on operation condition of generator/s. Further, please also explain why the equation for Wc refer to Wa readings (column AE of sheet ELexp).