Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification and certification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the revised monitoring plan as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 392.
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the following parameters in accordance with the monitoring plan and monitoring report which require continuous measurement, as there were gaps without measuring equipment identified as per the Appendices 2 and 3 of the monitoring report:
(a) MDFL/MMFL:
- For Flare gas T, the equipment was removed for calibration on 19/05/2014 but it was only installed back on 23/05/2014. It was again removed for calibration on 13/05/2015 and only put back on 19/05/2015.
- For Flare thermal couples, the equipment for High and Low was removed for calibration on 19/05/2014 but it was only installed back on 23/05/2014. It was again removed for calibration on 07/05/2015 but it was never installed back.
- For Flare thermal couples, the equipment for Medium was removed for calibration on 03/03/2014 but it was only installed back on 07/03/2014. It was again removed for calibration on 01/03/2015 and it was only put back on 26/03/2015.
- For V-cone 1# for flare, the equipment with SN 7102302 was removed for calibration on 02/04/2014, but it was never installed back.
- For DP 1# for flare, the equipment was calibrated on site on 21/03/2014 but it was not installed (Monitoring report page 45).
- For V-cone 2# for flare, the equipment with SN 7102301 was removed for calibration on 02/04/2014, but was only installed back on 04/04/2014.
(b) MMELEC/MDELEC being measured continuously, as there was gaps without equipment identified. The Appendices 2 and 3 show that for V-cone engine 1 to V-cone engine 7, the equipment was removed for calibration on 02/04/2014 but it was only installed back on 04/04/2014.
(c) HEATy: (i) For T-Oil outlet, the equipment was removed for calibration on 19/05/2014 but it was only put back on 29/05/2014. It was again removed for calibration on 13/05/2015 but it was only put back on 19/05/2015; (ii) For T-Oil return, the equipment with SN 2013050801 was removed for calibration on 19/05/2014 but it was only put back on 29/05/2014. It was again removed for calibration on 13/05/2015 but it was only put back on 19/05/2015.

2: Scope: The verification and certification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan and does not provide an statement on how the DOE verified the information flow for these parameters including the values in the monitoring reports as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 393 and 409 (e).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified the determination of default value for flare efficiency in the provided emission reductions spreadsheet, in particular how it has verified the correctness of the application for each default value. The monitoring report has provided the conditions to be fulfilled for each default value and the manufacturer's specification. However from the spreadsheet it is not clear what represent the flow, the flare temperature and the flaring time/duration in hour h.

3: Scope: The verification and certification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified by the applied methodology, the standardized baseline and/or the monitoring plan as per VVS version 09.0 paragraph 400.
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it concluded that there was no delayed calibration, in particular for:
(a) Flare CH4% (relevant parameters: PCCH4,mass, MMFL). The appendices 2 and 3 of the monitoring report show that for equipment serial number 34435 the calibration was only valid for 1 year, hence until 20/03/2015. However the equipment was used until 26/03/2015;
(b) Barometic pressure (relevant parameters: MMFL). The appendices 2 and 3 of the monitoring report show that for equipment serial number 4980062 the calibration was only valid for 1 year, hence until 20/03/2015. However the equipment was used until 27/03/2015.

4: Scope: The verification and certification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved nor/or confirm that appropriate methods and formulae for calculating baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage have been followed as per VVS version 09.0 paragraphs 403 (c) and 409 (j).
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified that periods during which all CDM data was missing had no ER claim associated (monitoring report page 10), in particular for GENy data, as sheet "Power MR4" only shows reading at the beginning of each month. For example, as per the Appendix 5 of the monitoring report, there was missing CDM data from 2014-03.21 03:00:00 to 2014-03.21 09:00:00. However from the sheet "Power MR4" it is not evident that data for GENy during that period were not included in the ER calculation.