Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: As per the monitoring report, a Kitchen test was done in 10 households to assess the average fuelwood use at 90/10 confidence/precision level for each of the common cooking item for non-project households where only traditional stoves are used. It also states that the reliability was achieved. However:
(a) There is no information on the expected value of the parameter or expected variance (or standard deviation) as required by paragraph 13(b) and 13(c) of the standard “Sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and programmes of activities” (version 08.0) in order to calculate the sample size;
(b) The calculation of the reliability which includes the data obtained from each of the 10 households is not provided, and there is no information how the DOE verified whether the selected households were representative of the population. Refer paragraph 25 of the standard “Sampling and surveys for CDM project activities and programmes of activities” (version 08.0).


2: As per the verification report, from the Kitchen test result and the number of time that each household prepare the specific food items using the fuel wood in a year, PP has determined the fuel wood consumption from parallel use of traditional wood stove for cooking. Also, page 18 of the monitoring report provides the average fuelwood used as proportion for each of the food item to the total fuelwood. However, the ER spreadsheet does not show how the results of the sampling shown in page 18 of the monitoring report are used in the ER calculation, in particular to each relevant households under the project activity. Refer paragraph 372 of VVS-PA (version 02.0).