05:47 21 Oct 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The data collection procedure and the line diagram showing all relevant monitoring points were not reported.
2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: It is not clear how the DOE has verified the physical features of the proposed CDM project activity. In particular, (i) the amount of captive power plants/units within the project boundary; (ii) the type of each power plant/unit within the project boundary (e.g. gas turbine or steam turbine etc.); (iii) the fuel used in each power plant/unit; and (iv) the source of the waste energy recovered by the waste heat boiler and the output of the waste heat recovery boiler (section A.4 of the monitoring report).
3: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: Please explain how the DOE has verified that the monitoring plan is in line with the applied methodology (AMS II.D version 7).
4: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The DOE shall substantiate the correctness of the applied assumption of natural gas consumption in PAP Boiler (15,000 SCM/day) in the baseline scenario. In doing so, please also explain whether the conservativeness and appropriateness of this value has been validated as per the applied methodology and whether it has been determined in the registered PDD.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The data collection procedure and the line diagram showing all relevant monitoring points were not reported.
2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: It is not clear how the DOE has verified the physical features of the proposed CDM project activity. In particular, (i) the amount of captive power plants/units within the project boundary; (ii) the type of each power plant/unit within the project boundary (e.g. gas turbine or steam turbine etc.); (iii) the fuel used in each power plant/unit; and (iv) the source of the waste energy recovered by the waste heat boiler and the output of the waste heat recovery boiler (section A.4 of the monitoring report).
3: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: Please explain how the DOE has verified that the monitoring plan is in line with the applied methodology (AMS II.D version 7).
4: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The DOE shall substantiate the correctness of the applied assumption of natural gas consumption in PAP Boiler (15,000 SCM/day) in the baseline scenario. In doing so, please also explain whether the conservativeness and appropriateness of this value has been validated as per the applied methodology and whether it has been determined in the registered PDD.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: