Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points has not been provided in the section C of the monitoring report. Please also note that the parameter Fbase in the Section D.1 of the monitoring report is incorrectly described.

2: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain the formulae of calculation that are shown in the spreadsheet cells whenever possible. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (b) (ii)).
Issue: The ER spreadsheet contains incorrect links to the external spreadsheet. For example in sheet "ER Fixed Connected Load 2010", cell B16 (Power consumed at baseline year 2010) is linked to spreadsheet "3 PM-3 SEP-10 TO DEC-11.xls" sheet "Mixing Chest" cell F22, which is the sum of the Pump (Project) Energy consumption for the entire monitoring period.

3: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: The DOE is requested to further substantiate how the implementation of the project activity has been in accordance with the registered PDD, in particular: (a) as the verification report page 6 states "During the first verification (1 January 2006 to 31 December 2006) /19/, project developer had clarified that the following components will not be installed during the entire crediting period. The non-implementation of these components was verified and confirmed during the current site visit". Furthermore, why post registration changes were not made in order to address the changes; (b) as the in house electricity is also generated by diesel generator, which is not stated in the registered PDD; (c) as the specification of the following equipment is not in accordance with the Enclosure #1 of the registered PDD: Capacitor banks at SFT A&B and NFL, Harmonic filters at PM1; (d) as the verification report does not provided information how the DOE verified the implementation of the project being in accordance with the registered PDD.

4: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVM v.1.2 para 206 & 221(d))
Issue: The DOE is requested to further substantiate how it concluded that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with the revised monitoring plan, as: (a) the coal consumption, as verified by the DOE, is based on monthly report, whereas the revised monitoring plan requires the measurement of the parameter; (b) the parameter Operating/ running hours of the equipments based on operating hours of the parent machine or equipment (such as pumps connected to paper machine, VFDs connected to fans, and the Compressors that are included in the project boundary) as per the revised monitoring plan is to be measured, whereas the spreadsheet shows that the they are calculated based on down time.

5: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: The DOE has confirmed that the monitoring plan contained in the registered PDD of 28 August 2006 is in accordance with the approved methodology applied by the project activity, i.e. AMS-II.D. (version 07) and AMS-I.D. (version 09). However, it has not confirmed that the revised monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodologies.


6: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue: The verification report has not provided information on how the DOE has verified: (a) the diesel consumption for the in house electricity generation; (b) the operating hours of the lamps based on hour meter connected to sample lamps in each area, in line with the EB65 Annex 2 paragraph 21.

7: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The DOE has not provided its opinion regarding the assumptions used in emission calculations calculation (eg. emission factors, default values and other reference values).

8: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The Verification Report has not provided information on how DOE verified the calibration of meters to measure the consumption of coal and diesel for the in house electricity generation.