Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: As per paragraph 258 of PS-PA (version 02.0), the PP shall describe the monitoring system and provide line diagrams (graphical schemes) showing all relevant monitoring points.
The PP is requested to provide a monitoring diagram which depicts: (1) The three different customers stated in the spreadsheet (i.e. Vaayu (India) Power Corporation Private Limited- I, - II and – III); (2) The 17 clusters as mentioned in the monitoring report; (3) The other clusters of the other projects; (4) The four main meters also known as revenue meter at Wind World (India) Limited substation at Sadodar, which are also connected to wind turbines installed by other project owners; (5) The GETCO main meter at the EIL substation as stated in the PDD.

2: As per paragraph 366 of VVS-PA, if, during the verification of a certain monitoring period, the DOE identifies that the calibration has been delayed, conservative approach is to be applied in the ER calculation.
The DOE stated that a maximum correction factor (0.2%) has been applied for the delay in calibration in line with para 366 of CDM validation and verification standard for project activities, version 02.0. As the ER sheet shows that the maximum permissible error of the meter is applied to net electricity supply, the DOE is requested to provide explanation why the maximum permissible error of the meter is not applied to electricity import and electricity export separately. It is to be noted that appendix of the VVS-PA provides example for separate application for electricity export and electricity import.

3: As per paragraph 373(c) of VVS-PA, the DOE shall determine whether the calculations of baseline GHG emissions have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the registered monitoring plan.
The DOE is requested to clarify "Te" in the equation mentioned in section E.8.1 of verification report (i.e. "EGPJ, y = EGExport,y – EGImport,y – TE") as this "Te" is not mentioned in the PDD or the monitoring plan