12:32 18 Apr 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: Project participants shall describe the monitoring system and provide line diagrams (graphical schemes) showing all relevant monitoring points. This description may include data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculations and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, and emergency procedures for the monitoring system. (PS v7 para 250)
Issue: Page 57 of the revised PDD describes energy meters of “Me1”, “Me2A”, “Me2B”, “Me2D”, “Me3A” and “Me3B” in the monitoring system, whereas the monitoring point related to those energy meters are not illustrated in the diagram of the monitoring report (page 6). In addition, the description of “Me3A” and “Me3B” in the revised PDD (page 57) is not consistent with the description of “Me3” in the monitoring report (page 11), since the revised PDD indicates two meters whereas the monitoring report indicates one meter for the monitoring of in house electricity consumption.
2: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVS v7, para 290 (b))
Issue: In table "Summary of net electricity gene" of the ER spreadsheet, it is observed that the sum of Recipient Power Supply to LMEL and Recipient Power Supply to Grid (7366.5 MWh) is higher than net electricity generation (7235.3 MWh) in July 2013. The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified the electricity data/system, in particular why the electricity received by the recipients is higher than the power generated by the project activity.
3: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVS v7, para 291 (c), 330 (i))
Issue: With regard to the calculation of energy content in WHRB steam and FBC steam (i.e. table "Emission Reduction calculations" in the ER spreadsheet), it is not clear how those values are calculated from the hourly-recorded steam/water temperature, steam pressure and quantity. In doing so, please also: (a) explain how the enthalpy of the steam/water is calculated based on those hourly-recorded monitoring parameters; (b) provide a spreadsheet used to calculate those energy contents.
1: Scope: Project participants shall describe the monitoring system and provide line diagrams (graphical schemes) showing all relevant monitoring points. This description may include data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculations and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, and emergency procedures for the monitoring system. (PS v7 para 250)
Issue: Page 57 of the revised PDD describes energy meters of “Me1”, “Me2A”, “Me2B”, “Me2D”, “Me3A” and “Me3B” in the monitoring system, whereas the monitoring point related to those energy meters are not illustrated in the diagram of the monitoring report (page 6). In addition, the description of “Me3A” and “Me3B” in the revised PDD (page 57) is not consistent with the description of “Me3” in the monitoring report (page 11), since the revised PDD indicates two meters whereas the monitoring report indicates one meter for the monitoring of in house electricity consumption.
2: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVS v7, para 290 (b))
Issue: In table "Summary of net electricity gene" of the ER spreadsheet, it is observed that the sum of Recipient Power Supply to LMEL and Recipient Power Supply to Grid (7366.5 MWh) is higher than net electricity generation (7235.3 MWh) in July 2013. The DOE is requested to explain how it has verified the electricity data/system, in particular why the electricity received by the recipients is higher than the power generated by the project activity.
3: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVS v7, para 291 (c), 330 (i))
Issue: With regard to the calculation of energy content in WHRB steam and FBC steam (i.e. table "Emission Reduction calculations" in the ER spreadsheet), it is not clear how those values are calculated from the hourly-recorded steam/water temperature, steam pressure and quantity. In doing so, please also: (a) explain how the enthalpy of the steam/water is calculated based on those hourly-recorded monitoring parameters; (b) provide a spreadsheet used to calculate those energy contents.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: