Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with registered or the accepted revised monitoring plan. (VVS ver. 07 para 280)
Issues: i. The data source for the operating time for each solar cooker (ti) has been indicated as follows: a) the registered MP (pg. 18) _“determined by the result of the sampling survey”, b) the MR (pg. 9) _ “measured by the project monitoring team”, and VR (pg. 24) _ measured by the sampled users (i.e. “sampled users would note the daily usage time for the solar cooker”). The PP/DOE are requested to correct these inconsistencies;
ii. The MR (pg. 7) states that “the quality of data was checked by the “RES” and project owner separately”. However, no information has been provided on the how the “RES” and the project owner checked the quality of the data measured by the households. Please clarify how the data quality was checked by the “RES” and the project owner; and
iii. It is further noted that the MR (pg. 10) has reported the QA/QC procedures conducted for missing or damaged data. However, information related to the QA/QC procedures to check the rest of the data measured by the households, i.e. data that is not “missing or damaged”, has not been provided. Please provide additional information on the QA/QC procedures for the data measured by the sampled users (please refer to the applied methodology AMS-I.C ver. 18 pg. 15 and EB 50 Annex 30 section IV_ General guidelines for sampling and surveys for SSC project activities).

2: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources. (VVS ver. 07, para 290(b))
Issue: The VR (pg.33) states that “in order to verify the monitored data and determine whether the data applied is acceptable for ER calculation the verification team therefore checked ALL the original monitoring data of ALL 79 households obtained for the parameter B as collected from the RES”. However, no information has been provided on how the DOE crosschecked the data reported by the RES.