Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue:
In doing so, the DOE shall explain:
a) if the designed capacity has been changed given that the PDD (page 6) states that the compression facility will have a “feed rate (design)” of 135 mmscfd whereas the Monitoring Report (Section A.4) states that the plant is designed to process approximately 130 mmscfd of associated gas; and
b) if there has been a change to the (compression) gas sales specification given that the PDD (page 6) states a specification of “450 psi to 1300 psi” whereas the Monitoring Report (Section A.4) states a specification of “450 psi to 1200 psi”.

2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment on whether the calibration of measuring equipments was conducted at a frequency specified in applied monitoring methodology or EB guidance if applicable, and/or the monitoring plan? (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue:In doing so, please clarify the inconsistency in the calibration dates of the orifice flow meter (FT -003) used to monitor LP inlet gas (VA3,y) i.e. MR states the calibration date as 29/11/2010 and the verification report states 01/12/2010.