19:31 28 Apr 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the nature, extend and duration of the non-conforming monitoring and the proposed alternative monitoring of the project activity (PS v07 para 268)
Issue:The PP/DOE are requested to address the following inconsistency: The MR (pg. 13) states that “ESj.i, import ,y have not been monitored as per PDD due to the fact that the electricity company has signed a contract with the project owner to take the monthly imported electricity amount as pre-agreed amount instead of monitored amount”. However, the VR (pg. 13) and the assessment opinion (pg.2) state that “The meters monitoring the electricity imported from the grid to the Phase j project were managed and recorded by the 8 projects’ owner. The incompleteness and loss of monitoring data for 8 projects from these meters in some months during this monitoring period were reported by the project participants. The project participants were thus temporarily unable to monitor ESj, i,import, y in accordance with the registered monitoring plan in the duration of 16 July 2012 to 28 February 2014”.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan. (PS v07, para 252)
Issue:The MR (pgs. 14/15) has listed “the amount of electricity exported to the grid from the wind farm connected to the transformer in year y (ESp,export,y); and the amount of electricity imported from the grid to the wind farm connected to the transformer in year y (ESp,import,y)”as monitored parameters. However, the monitored values have not been reported in the submitted documents.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the nature, extend and duration of the non-conforming monitoring and the proposed alternative monitoring of the project activity (PS v07 para 268)
Issue:The PP/DOE are requested to address the following inconsistency: The MR (pg. 13) states that “ESj.i, import ,y have not been monitored as per PDD due to the fact that the electricity company has signed a contract with the project owner to take the monthly imported electricity amount as pre-agreed amount instead of monitored amount”. However, the VR (pg. 13) and the assessment opinion (pg.2) state that “The meters monitoring the electricity imported from the grid to the Phase j project were managed and recorded by the 8 projects’ owner. The incompleteness and loss of monitoring data for 8 projects from these meters in some months during this monitoring period were reported by the project participants. The project participants were thus temporarily unable to monitor ESj, i,import, y in accordance with the registered monitoring plan in the duration of 16 July 2012 to 28 February 2014”.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan. (PS v07, para 252)
Issue:The MR (pgs. 14/15) has listed “the amount of electricity exported to the grid from the wind farm connected to the transformer in year y (ESp,export,y); and the amount of electricity imported from the grid to the wind farm connected to the transformer in year y (ESp,import,y)”as monitored parameters. However, the monitored values have not been reported in the submitted documents.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: