17:37 30 May 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: As per VVS-PA Para 363, DOE shall state whether the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with the registered monitoring plan.
As per the ER spreadsheet, for December 2019, the total generation has been apportioned based on number of days of the monitoring period in December 2019. However, the apportioning procedure mentioned in the registered PDD requires use of daily export and import reading from main and check meter for periods where verification period dates and billing cycle dates (JMR dates) do not coincide. The DOE is therefore requested to clarify how it has confirmed that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with the registered monitoring plan
2: As per VVS para 368, If the results of the delayed calibration are not available, or the calibration has not been conducted at the time of the verification, the DOE, prior to finalizing the verification, shall request the project participants to conduct the required calibration and shall determine whether the project participants have calculated GHG emission reductions conservatively using the approach mentioned in paragraph 366.
As per the requirement of 6-month calibration frequency, meters HPU 0032 and 0033 would have to be re-calibrated in Jul 2020. As they were used until 12 Nov 2020, the PP has applied the maximum permissible error for the whole month of Jul to Nov 2020. However, there is no information on calibration of meters HPU 0032 and 0033 after the calibration on 4 Jan 2020 in order to support the claim that the application of maximum permissible error of the meters is conservative. The DOE is requested to explain how provision of paragraph 366 of VVS-PA is complied with without any information when the delayed calibration was conducted.
3: As per VVS 3.0 para 373a, DOE shall determine whether a complete set of data for the specified monitoring period is available.
In CL3 of the VR, the PP clarified that the total quantity of Diesel Consumed in the month of Dec 2019 has been accounted in the previous monitoring period, hence the diesel consumed for 4 days of Dec 2019 in the current monitoring period is considered as zero. The DOE is requested to clarify whether there was any diesel consumption in the 4 days of Dec 2019 in the current monitoring period. If there was, the DOE shall explain how it concluded that a complete set of data for the monitoring period is available and that the calculation of project emissions has been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan, considering that the project emissions from diesel consumption for 4 days of Dec 2019 in the current monitoring period are not considered.
1: As per VVS-PA Para 363, DOE shall state whether the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with the registered monitoring plan.
As per the ER spreadsheet, for December 2019, the total generation has been apportioned based on number of days of the monitoring period in December 2019. However, the apportioning procedure mentioned in the registered PDD requires use of daily export and import reading from main and check meter for periods where verification period dates and billing cycle dates (JMR dates) do not coincide. The DOE is therefore requested to clarify how it has confirmed that the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with the registered monitoring plan
2: As per VVS para 368, If the results of the delayed calibration are not available, or the calibration has not been conducted at the time of the verification, the DOE, prior to finalizing the verification, shall request the project participants to conduct the required calibration and shall determine whether the project participants have calculated GHG emission reductions conservatively using the approach mentioned in paragraph 366.
As per the requirement of 6-month calibration frequency, meters HPU 0032 and 0033 would have to be re-calibrated in Jul 2020. As they were used until 12 Nov 2020, the PP has applied the maximum permissible error for the whole month of Jul to Nov 2020. However, there is no information on calibration of meters HPU 0032 and 0033 after the calibration on 4 Jan 2020 in order to support the claim that the application of maximum permissible error of the meters is conservative. The DOE is requested to explain how provision of paragraph 366 of VVS-PA is complied with without any information when the delayed calibration was conducted.
3: As per VVS 3.0 para 373a, DOE shall determine whether a complete set of data for the specified monitoring period is available.
In CL3 of the VR, the PP clarified that the total quantity of Diesel Consumed in the month of Dec 2019 has been accounted in the previous monitoring period, hence the diesel consumed for 4 days of Dec 2019 in the current monitoring period is considered as zero. The DOE is requested to clarify whether there was any diesel consumption in the 4 days of Dec 2019 in the current monitoring period. If there was, the DOE shall explain how it concluded that a complete set of data for the monitoring period is available and that the calculation of project emissions has been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan, considering that the project emissions from diesel consumption for 4 days of Dec 2019 in the current monitoring period are not considered.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: