23:10 10 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The DOE has reported that "There was a gap of around two months in the calibration" for the weighing bridge measuring the "Total quantity of biomass fuel procured/consumed by the project activity" on page 11 and page 18 of the Verification Report. It is also noted that the values of "Total quantity of biomass fuel procured/consumed by the project activity" were used in the calculation of CERs, since the Verification Report (page 20) states that "In line with para 18 of the methodology, the lower of the gross electricity generation at 66 839.9 MWh and 7893 MWh of auxiliary consumption have been considered to arrive at the net electricity and subsequent baseline emissions". The DOE is requested to provide information regarding how it verified that EB 52 Annex 60 was appropriately followed.
Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The DOE has reported that "There was a gap of around two months in the calibration" for the weighing bridge measuring the "Total quantity of biomass fuel procured/consumed by the project activity" on page 11 and page 18 of the Verification Report. It is also noted that the values of "Total quantity of biomass fuel procured/consumed by the project activity" were used in the calculation of CERs, since the Verification Report (page 20) states that "In line with para 18 of the methodology, the lower of the gross electricity generation at 66 839.9 MWh and 7893 MWh of auxiliary consumption have been considered to arrive at the net electricity and subsequent baseline emissions". The DOE is requested to provide information regarding how it verified that EB 52 Annex 60 was appropriately followed.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: