Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: The DOE is requested to justify the difference of the design flow of the project activity. The PDD mentions it as 5.29 m3/s, whereas the monitoring report mentions it as 4.83 m3/s.

2: Scope: The verification report does not provide a conclusion on the verified amount of emission reductions achieved and/or determine that calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions and leakage as appropriate have been carried out in accordance with the formulae and methods described in the monitoring plan and the applied methodology document. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (c) & 221 (h))
Issue: The DOE has not explained why a correction of 1.75% is applied to the net electricity in the spreadsheet (Column F sheet "Montyly power recoard").