Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: PS-PA Para 261(b):
Section D.2 of the monitoring report makes reference to annex 1 for calibration details. However, the monitoring report does not contain annex 1.

2: VVS-PA Para 368 and Para 370(a):
(a) As per the registered monitoring plan, autoclave used for measuring moisture content of the biomass shall be calibrated by an external agency. However, there is no information how this has been complied with and how the DOE verified this; (b) As per section E.6.3 of the verification report, the accuracy class of temperature gauge used for measurement of temperature of the steam extracted from turbine is 1.50s, however, the error applied in the ER spreadsheet is 0.001. The DOE shall confirm how it has confirmed that the error has been applied correctly.

3: VVS-PA, Para 360:
For parameter Bbiomass,y, para 50 of applied methodology requires cross-check of measurements with an annual energy balance that is based on purchased quantities (e.g. with sales receipts) and stock changes, and in cases where emission reductions are calculated based on energy output, check the consistency of measurements ex post with annual data on energy generation, fossil fuels and biomass used and the efficiency of energy generation as determined ex ante. The registered monitoring plan also requires that the quantity of biomass will be cross checked with the energy output in the project activity. However, there is no information how these provisions have been complied with and how the DOE verified it. The DOE is requested to provide such cross-check calculation and information how it verified these provisions. Furthermore, in light of this, the DOE is also requested to explain how it concluded that delay in weighbridge calibration has no impact on the emission reductions considering that it will be used for crosscheck.

4: VVS-PA Para 375:
The PP has calculated baseline emissions as per coal-based co-generation plant for comparison purposes under column AE of the ER spreadsheet. However, it is observed that for EGPJ,electrical,y component , kWh to TJ conversion is incorrect. The DOE/PP is requested to revisit the calculation of EGPJ,electrical,y component.