Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: Monitoring points are not clearly depicted on the monitoring scheme presented on page 19 of the Monitoring Report. The meters in the substation (ADDC main meters, marked with a green box according to the legend) could not be found on the figure presented in page 19 of the MR; likewise, only 14 out of 16 on-site meters are indicated in the graph. Please clarify.

2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The monitoring plan states that calibration of TEGy will be undertaken once a year (p. 28), whereas the Monitoring Report (p. 22) indicates that calibration frequency for this parameter is once every three years.

3: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: The VR (page 30) indicates that 16 meters are installed on-site; however, the VR later on the same page mentions that only 14 meters (1-6, 9-11, 12, 13, 14-16) have been checked during on-site visit.