07:58 16 Jan 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The post-registration change proposes to correct the monitoring frequency for the parameter “Return trip road distance between the origin and destination for the raw materials from “continuously” to “once in the monitoring period”. The DOE is requested to clarify how it considers the revised monitoring plan in compliance with the applicable methodological tool “Project and leakage emissions from road transportation of freight” parameter table 2 which requires the monitoring frequency as “To be updated whenever the distance changes”.
2: The registered PDD (page 6) identified fly-ash as the one of the key raw material ingredients for the manufacture of the project activity blocks. The post-registration change proposes to exclude this parameter (i.e. quantity of fly ash used by the project activity) in the registered monitoring plan and DOE validates/justifies this exclusion by stating that this parameter is not required for the emission reduction calculation. The DOE is requested to clarify how it considers the revised monitoring plan to be in accordance with the applied methodology (AMS-III.Z ver. 4 para 28 (b)) which requires that monitoring shall include the principal raw materials.
3: The ER calculation sheet (workbook “Data inputs”) is not traceable. Please submit (i) an ER calculation spreadsheet which shows how the yearly input data applied in calculating the emission reductions were aggregated and (ii) the spreadsheet containing the monitored net production output data (kg or m3 per day), as required by AMS-III.Z ver. 04 para 28 (a), as this has not been submitted.
1: The post-registration change proposes to correct the monitoring frequency for the parameter “Return trip road distance between the origin and destination for the raw materials from “continuously” to “once in the monitoring period”. The DOE is requested to clarify how it considers the revised monitoring plan in compliance with the applicable methodological tool “Project and leakage emissions from road transportation of freight” parameter table 2 which requires the monitoring frequency as “To be updated whenever the distance changes”.
2: The registered PDD (page 6) identified fly-ash as the one of the key raw material ingredients for the manufacture of the project activity blocks. The post-registration change proposes to exclude this parameter (i.e. quantity of fly ash used by the project activity) in the registered monitoring plan and DOE validates/justifies this exclusion by stating that this parameter is not required for the emission reduction calculation. The DOE is requested to clarify how it considers the revised monitoring plan to be in accordance with the applied methodology (AMS-III.Z ver. 4 para 28 (b)) which requires that monitoring shall include the principal raw materials.
3: The ER calculation sheet (workbook “Data inputs”) is not traceable. Please submit (i) an ER calculation spreadsheet which shows how the yearly input data applied in calculating the emission reductions were aggregated and (ii) the spreadsheet containing the monitored net production output data (kg or m3 per day), as required by AMS-III.Z ver. 04 para 28 (a), as this has not been submitted.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: