16:02 16 Aug 26
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a comparison of the actual CERs claimed in the monitoring period with the estimate in the PDD, and/or explanation on any significant increase. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (viii)).
Issue:
The monitoring report states (p30) that the values applied in ex-ante calculation of the registered CDM-PDD (188.474 tCO2/Year) have to be divided by 294 days in order to get the daily average of tCO2e estimated in the PDD. However, as per the PDD (p3), this value is "the average operating time per year in [previous] three campaigns" and not the number of days in a year. The project participant is requested to clarify this inconsistency.
Moreover the comparison provided in section E.5 was not made on a consistent basis. The project participant is requested to provide a consistent comparison.
Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a comparison of the actual CERs claimed in the monitoring period with the estimate in the PDD, and/or explanation on any significant increase. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (viii)).
Issue:
The monitoring report states (p30) that the values applied in ex-ante calculation of the registered CDM-PDD (188.474 tCO2/Year) have to be divided by 294 days in order to get the daily average of tCO2e estimated in the PDD. However, as per the PDD (p3), this value is "the average operating time per year in [previous] three campaigns" and not the number of days in a year. The project participant is requested to clarify this inconsistency.
Moreover the comparison provided in section E.5 was not made on a consistent basis. The project participant is requested to provide a consistent comparison.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: