03:08 07 Jul 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain information on how the DOE validated that the changes from the registered monitoring plan are in accordance to para 4 and 5 of the Appendix 1 of Project Standard which do not require prior approval of the Board (VVS v2, para 248,262)
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain why a prior approval PRC is not submitted as the PRC contains the revision of monitoring parameters
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (PS v1 para 188 (a)(b)(c))
Issue:1. The DOE/PP is requested to provide more information on the project implementation, a)the capacity of the diesel generator and how it will meet the demand of emergency situation. b)the meter locations
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan. (PS v1, para 191, 192 (a)(c )(d)(e)(f))
Issue:The revised PDD stated that : “The net supply (i.e. gross supply minus supply by the grid to the project but in this case the net supply is equal to the gross supply) will be used in the calculations”. It is not clear how the DOE has verified that the net supply is equal to the gross supply and that the method is conservative.
The DOE is requested to clarify whether the sales invoices based on the one direction/export meter accurately reflects the net electricity displaced in the grid and further confirm whether the sales invoice are based only on the one-direction meter.
The DOE is requested to clarify whether the installation of one direction meter is in line with the local regulation.
4: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions, leakage (if any), and emission reductions, including reference to formulae and methods used (PS v1, 194 (a)(b)(c)(d))
Issue: The DOE/PP is requested to clarify why the project emission occurred due to the diesel generator can be neglected as per the requirement of ACM00012 version 13, considering that the proposed project is not a solar or geothermal project.
1: Scope: The validation opinion does not contain information on how the DOE validated that the changes from the registered monitoring plan are in accordance to para 4 and 5 of the Appendix 1 of Project Standard which do not require prior approval of the Board (VVS v2, para 248,262)
Issue: The DOE is requested to explain why a prior approval PRC is not submitted as the PRC contains the revision of monitoring parameters
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the implementation status of the project (including a brief description of the installed technology and/or equipments, relevant dates of project activity e.g. date of construction, commissioning, continued operation periods, etc.) during the monitoring period under consideration. (PS v1 para 188 (a)(b)(c))
Issue:1. The DOE/PP is requested to provide more information on the project implementation, a)the capacity of the diesel generator and how it will meet the demand of emergency situation. b)the meter locations
3: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain the values of the monitored parameters used to calculate baseline, project and leakage emissions as well as other parameters required by the applied methodology and the registered monitoring plan. (PS v1, para 191, 192 (a)(c )(d)(e)(f))
Issue:The revised PDD stated that : “The net supply (i.e. gross supply minus supply by the grid to the project but in this case the net supply is equal to the gross supply) will be used in the calculations”. It is not clear how the DOE has verified that the net supply is equal to the gross supply and that the method is conservative.
The DOE is requested to clarify whether the sales invoices based on the one direction/export meter accurately reflects the net electricity displaced in the grid and further confirm whether the sales invoice are based only on the one-direction meter.
The DOE is requested to clarify whether the installation of one direction meter is in line with the local regulation.
4: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain calculations of baseline emissions, project emissions, leakage (if any), and emission reductions, including reference to formulae and methods used (PS v1, 194 (a)(b)(c)(d))
Issue: The DOE/PP is requested to clarify why the project emission occurred due to the diesel generator can be neglected as per the requirement of ACM00012 version 13, considering that the proposed project is not a solar or geothermal project.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: