Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: As per VVS 3.0 para 366, if, during the verification of a certain monitoring period, the DOE identifies that the calibration has been delayed, conservative approach is to be applied in the ER calculation.
The DOE stated that a maximum correction factor (0.2%) has been applied for the delay in calibration in line with para 366 of CDM validation and verification standard for project activities, version 03.0. As the ER sheet shows that the maximum permissible error of the meter is applied to net electricity supply, the DOE is requested to provide explanation why the maximum permissible error of the meter is not applied to electricity import and electricity export separately. It is to be noted that appendix of the VVS-PA provides example for separate application for electricity export and electricity import.

2: As per VVS 3.0 para 372, the DOE shall assess the data and calculations of GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals achieved by from the registered CDM project activity.
The DOE is requested to explain how it verified the calculation in the spreadsheet in particular "G_NEGRETE" and "C_NEGRETE" that are not described in the Monitoring report or explained in the spreadsheets.

3: As per decision from EB106 report para 26b, if the site visits cannot be postponed, a proper justification should be provided by the DOE as to why the site visits cannot be postponed, including the demonstration of a significant impact of delaying the site visits on the DOE or PP.
The DOE is requested to provide a proper justification in the verification report why the site visit cannot be postponed

4: As per VVS 3.0 para 395 g, the DOE shall report an assessment and close-out of any CARs, CLs or FARs issued to the project participants.
The DOE is requested to clarify how it closed CAR 3. CAR 3 was raised with the concern on change of the start date of crediting period but it was responded and closed on the basis of approval of MoC.