Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The DOE shall determine whether the monitoring of parameters related to GHG emission reductions or net anthropogenic GHG removals in the registered PDD has been implemented in accordance with the registered monitoring plan (paragraph 360 of VVS for PA version 2):
The data collection procedure in the monitoring report (page 8) states that the net electricity supplied to power grid data are measured continuously by 51 turbine meters. However, the spreadsheet submitted shows that the net electricity supplied derived from only 2 value addition. Furthermore, page 7 of the monitoring report indicates the use of Main Meter 1 and Main Meter 2 to monitor the power exported to power grid and power imported from power grid, and the Verification Report page 14 states that parameter EGfacility,y is monitored by main meters and check meters located at substation and 51 turbine meters installed at individual WTG (turbine). The DOE is required to provide further information on how it verified the monitoring of the data used to calculate the parameter EGfacility,y since there are discrepancies between the monitoring report and the verification report.

2: As per VVS para 366, if, during the verification of a certain monitoring period, the DOE identifies that the calibration has been delayed, conservative approach is to be applied in the ER calculation.
The DOE stated that delay in calibration observed and is addressed in line with para 366 (a) of CDM validation and verification standard for project activities, version 02.0. As the ER sheet shows that the maximum permissible error of the meter is applied to net electricity supply. The DOE is requested to provide explanation why the maximum permissible error of the meter is not applied to electricity import and electricity export separately. It is to be noted that appendix of the VVS-PA provides example for separate application for electricity export and electricity import.