23:39 16 Jul 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The Annex 2 of the Monitoring Report does not provided clear description of the location of the meters. The abbreviations do not match the diagram. For example in page 12, the diagram shows MM, however, what MM is has not been described.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The Monitoring Report page 8 mentions the calibration frequency of the meter as annually. However, Annex 1 of Monitoring Report has not provided information of the date of calibration that covers the whole monitoring period. For example, calibration date of meter for WTG K-47 is 14/08/2007 while the monitoring period started from 01/05/2007.
3: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain all parameters required to be monitored and/or reported at the intervals required by the monitoring plan and the applied methodology?
Issue: The monitoring plan requires monthly monitoring of the electricity supplied. The spreadsheet appears to have overlapping monitoring periods. For example, line 11 of "Generation Details" sheet shows 01/05/07 to 01/06/07 and line 12 shows 01/06/07 to 02/07/07. It is not clear whether data of date 01/06/07 falls into the first line or the second line or even into both lines.
4: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: The Monitoring Report page 8 mentions the accuracy of the meters as 0.5s, while the Verification Report mentions it as 0.2s.
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue: The Annex 2 of the Monitoring Report does not provided clear description of the location of the meters. The abbreviations do not match the diagram. For example in page 12, the diagram shows MM, however, what MM is has not been described.
2: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: The Monitoring Report page 8 mentions the calibration frequency of the meter as annually. However, Annex 1 of Monitoring Report has not provided information of the date of calibration that covers the whole monitoring period. For example, calibration date of meter for WTG K-47 is 14/08/2007 while the monitoring period started from 01/05/2007.
3: Scope: The spreadsheet does not contain all parameters required to be monitored and/or reported at the intervals required by the monitoring plan and the applied methodology?
Issue: The monitoring plan requires monthly monitoring of the electricity supplied. The spreadsheet appears to have overlapping monitoring periods. For example, line 11 of "Generation Details" sheet shows 01/05/07 to 01/06/07 and line 12 shows 01/06/07 to 02/07/07. It is not clear whether data of date 01/06/07 falls into the first line or the second line or even into both lines.
4: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue: The Monitoring Report page 8 mentions the accuracy of the meters as 0.5s, while the Verification Report mentions it as 0.2s.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: