Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not contain reference to the revision of monitoring plan requested and approved by the Executive Board. (VVM v.1.2 para 203)
Issue:
The DOE should clarify how the monitoring has been carried out in accordance with the revised monitoring plan given that it was submitted on 25 August 2011 but not yet approved by the EB.

2: Scope: The verification report does not state that the monitoring plan is in accordance with the applied methodology. (VVM v.1.2 para 200, 203 & 221(d))
Issue:
Since a 90% default value for the flare efficiency was chosen by the PP, the DOE should clarify how it has verified that continuous monitoring of compliance with the manufacturer’s specifications for the flare (i.e. temperature, flow rate of residual gas at the inlet of the flare, etc) was performed during the monitoring period. The DOE should also confirm that a 50% default value for the flare efficiency was used in the calculations when in a specific hour any of such parameters were out of the limit of the manufacturer’s specifications in accordance with the "Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane"