Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain information on calibration of monitoring instruments (frequency, relevant dates of calibration and/or validity) as specified by the monitoring methodology and the monitoring plan. (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (iv) & EB 54 Annex 34)
Issue: Annex 2 provides the calibration dates and frequency for all relevant monitoring instruments. However, It was identified that several instruments were calibrated beyond the yearly frequency and no assessment on how the delayed calibrations were addressed as per EB52 - Annex 60 was provided.

2: Scope: The verification report does not describe the reasons for the phased-implementation delay and/or does not present the expected implementation dates. (VVM v.1.2 para 198 (a)).
Issue: The Verification Report provides proper explanations on the reasons for delaying the delivery of landfill gas to brick factories and for the leachate treatment plant, however an expected date to the start of Phases 3 and 4 should also has been reported.

3: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue 1: The "Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane" states that the measuring point of methane and oxyge concentration in the exhaust gas shall be in the upper section of the flare (80% of total flare height), but the Verification Report does not indicate the exact sampling point.

Issue 2: The "Tool to determine project emissions from flaring gases containing methane" states that "An excessively high temperature at the sampling point (above 700ºC) may be an indication that the flare is not being adequately operated or that its capacity is not adequate to the actual flow". It was identified, in the calculation spreadsheet, that the temperature of the exhaust gas is generally above 700ºC and no assessment was provided on whether it indicates that the flare is being operated outsite of its capacity.

4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: It was identified that several instruments were callibrated beyond the yearly frequency and no assessment on how the delayed calibrations were addressed was provided.