03:35 23 Dec 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: VVS-PA Para 367 (b):
Section C of the monitoring report, section E.6.2 of the verification report, and the ER spreadsheet mention that there was a delay in calibration from September 2013 to February 2017 and accordingly an error factor of 0.2% has been applied to the period with delayed calibration. However, as per the ER spreadsheet, the delay in calibration has been applied from 23/09/2013 to 09/02/2017 while the meters were calibrated only on 15/02/2017 and 16/02/2017 (for U-1854). The DOE is therefore requested to clarify how it has confirmed that the error has been applied to all measured values taken during the period between the scheduled date of calibration and the actual date of calibration.
2: Refer VVS-PA Para 373(b):
As per the ER spreadsheet, for 09/2013 and 08/2018, the total generation has been divided equally for all days to get the net units for monitored period in these months. The DOE shall explain how it has cross-checked the net unit values for these months that are apportioned based on the applicable number of days with other sources (e.g. daily figure from controller meter as applicable).
1: VVS-PA Para 367 (b):
Section C of the monitoring report, section E.6.2 of the verification report, and the ER spreadsheet mention that there was a delay in calibration from September 2013 to February 2017 and accordingly an error factor of 0.2% has been applied to the period with delayed calibration. However, as per the ER spreadsheet, the delay in calibration has been applied from 23/09/2013 to 09/02/2017 while the meters were calibrated only on 15/02/2017 and 16/02/2017 (for U-1854). The DOE is therefore requested to clarify how it has confirmed that the error has been applied to all measured values taken during the period between the scheduled date of calibration and the actual date of calibration.
2: Refer VVS-PA Para 373(b):
As per the ER spreadsheet, for 09/2013 and 08/2018, the total generation has been divided equally for all days to get the net units for monitored period in these months. The DOE shall explain how it has cross-checked the net unit values for these months that are apportioned based on the applicable number of days with other sources (e.g. daily figure from controller meter as applicable).
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: