01:03 22 Nov 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it verified that the measurement failures and subsequent meter replacements in Santa Clara had no effect on the monitoring of the electricity supplied to the grid by the project activity.
2: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue: The DOE/PP are requested to provide the input values metered at the substation “Canteiro do Segredo” and the calculation of the net electricity supplied by Fundao PCH to the grid, in accordance with the explanation in the MR.
3: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (a) and (b))
Issue: The DOE is requested to provide information on which records (i.e. sales records) were used to cross check the information provided in the MR, in line with the monitoring plan in the registered PDD.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The PP/DOE is requested to provide information regarding the effect of the measurement errors recorded at Santa Clara and how the PP took the adequate measures to ensure an accurate monitoring during the relevant periods.
1: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: The DOE is requested to provide information on how it verified that the measurement failures and subsequent meter replacements in Santa Clara had no effect on the monitoring of the electricity supplied to the grid by the project activity.
2: Scope: The verification report does not list each parameter required by the monitoring plan (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue: The DOE/PP are requested to provide the input values metered at the substation “Canteiro do Segredo” and the calculation of the net electricity supplied by Fundao PCH to the grid, in accordance with the explanation in the MR.
3: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (a) and (b))
Issue: The DOE is requested to provide information on which records (i.e. sales records) were used to cross check the information provided in the MR, in line with the monitoring plan in the registered PDD.
4: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment of the compliance with EB 52 Annex 60 'Guidelines for assessing compliance with the calibration frequency requirements' for the calibration delay. (VVM v.1.2 para 184 (a) (ii) & EB 52 Annex 60)
Issue: The PP/DOE is requested to provide information regarding the effect of the measurement errors recorded at Santa Clara and how the PP took the adequate measures to ensure an accurate monitoring during the relevant periods.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: