CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	10354
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Beijing Haidian Beibu Gas-fired Cogeneration Project
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1) The DOE is requested to assess the accuracy and suitability of the input values for the investment comparison analysis, in particular the total investment cost and the O&M costs considering that: (i) The  DOE validated the contract for one of the sub-items of the total investment cost as 355.2 million RMB, which is higher than the corresponding sub-item value in the FSR used for sourcing the total investment cost for the project (1,365.28 million RMB or 5,483 RMB/kW) for calculating the project IRR. However, the other sub-items included in the total investment cost are not assessed and crosschecked. Furthermore, it is observed that a registered project activity in the same region used by the DOE for cross checking other input values has applied a substantially lower investment cost per kW. The DOE has not provided a validation opinion why it did not consider using the investment cost from this registered CDM project to cross check the suitability of the investment cost.   (ii) The DOE validated the annual O&M cost of 75,367,201 RMB/Year (project scenario P4) and 72,416,477 RMB/Year (baseline scenario P2) include the repair cost, salary& social welfare, materials fee, water fee, sewage charges, miscellaneous cost and the insurance fee. However, the DOE has not validated the accuracy and suitability of the higher O&M input value for the project scenario. Please refer to VVS ver. 09 paragraph 129.
Date	09 Nov 17