CDM project activity/programme of activities registration request review form (CDM-REGR-FORM) (Version 03.0)

Reference number of the proposed CDM project activity/programme of activities (PoA) submitted for registration	5801
Title of the proposed CDM project activity/PoA submitted for registration	Ikutmaju Biomass Cogeneration Project
Please indicate, in accordance with paragraphs 37 and 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures, which validation requirement(s) may require review. A list of requirements is provided below. Please provide reasons in support of the request for review. Including any supporting documentation.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 37 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The participation requirements as set out in paragraph 28 to 30 of the CDM modalities and procedures are satisfied; Comments by local stakeholders have been invited, a summary of the comments received has been provided, and a report to the designated operational entity (DOE) on how due account was taken of any comments has been received; Project Participants have submitted to the DOE documentation on the analysis of the environmental impacts of the project activity, including transboundary impacts and, if those impacts are considered significant by the project participants or the host Party, have undertaken an environmental impact assessment in accordance with procedures as required by the host Party; The project activity is expected to result in a reduction in anthropogenic emissions by sources of greenhouse gases that are additional to any that would occur in the absence of the proposed project activity, in accordance with paragraphs 43 to 52 of the CDM modalities and procedures; The baseline and monitoring methodologies comply with requirements pertaining to methodologies previously approved by the Executive Board; Provisions for monitoring, verification and reporting are in accordance with decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions of the COP/MOP; The project activity conforms to all other requirements for CDM project activities in decision 17/CP.7, the CDM modalities and procedures and relevant decisions by the COP/MOP and the Executive Board.
The following are requirements derived from paragraph 40 of the CDM modalities and procedures:
The DOE shall, prior to the submission of the validation report to the Executive Board, have received from the project participants written approval of voluntary participation from the designated national authority of each Party involved, including confirmation by the host Party that the project activity assists it in achieving sustainable development; In accordance with provisions on confidentiality contained in paragraph 27(h) of the CDM modalities and procedures, the DOE shall make publicly available the project design document; The DOE shall receive, within 30 days, comments on the validation requirements from Parties, stakeholders and UNFCCC accredited non-governmental organizations and make them publicly available; After the deadline for receipt of comments, the DOE shall make a determination as to whether, on the basis of the information provided and taking into account the comments received, the project activity should be validated; The DOE shall inform project participants of its determination on the validation of the project activity. Notification to the project participants will include confirmation of validation and the date of submission of the validation report to the Executive Board; The DOE shall submit to the Executive Board, if it determines the proposed project activity to be valid, a request for registration in the form of a validation report including of the project design document, the written approval of the host Party and an explanation of how it has taken due account of comments received.
There are only minor issues which should be addressed by the DOE/project participants prior to the registration of the project.
Additional information
1) The PDD states on page 3 that "In case of shortage of woodwaste, project activity will use palm kernel shells (PKS) from neighbouring mills to make up the shortfall. If PKS is used, this waste will be monitored ex-post." However, the validation report has not provide a validation opinion on the potential use of Palm Kernel Shell (PKS) in the project activity. The PP and DOE is requested to clarify why Palm Kernel Shell (PKS) has not been included in calculation for demonstration of availability of surplus biomass to show that there is no competing use of biomass. Please refer to VVM paragraph 91.. 2) The PDD and Validation Report as part of CAR 11 state that biomass available in the region is 25% more than the quantity required by project activity. As per 'Attachment C, General Guidance on Leakage in Biomass Project Activities' it shall be demonstrated that quantity of available biomass in the region is at least 25% more than total quantity utilized in the region including the project activity and other uses. PP and DOE shall clarify why other uses of biomass residues in the region have not been considered in the calculations. Please refer to VVM paragraph 89.. 3) The PDD in p.3 states that "If PKS is used, this waste will be monitored ex-post." The PP and DOE shall clarify why monitoring of PKS has not been included in the monitoring plan in the PDD. Please refer to VVM paragraph 123 (a)(ii).
Date	12 Feb 13