18:49 01 Aug 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all the PDD sections for the description of the project activity as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The steam system of the project activity is not clear. In particular, (i) in page 6 of the PDD, the description (the waste COG is combusted in gas-fired boilers to produce steam with medium temperature and pressure, and partial steam is pumped for heat supply and the rest steam is used for generating electricity) indicates that the steam is derived from the gas-fired boilers; (ii) whereas the Figure A.3 (PDD, page 7) indicates that the heat (in the form of steam) is derived from the steam turbine. Please also provide a diagram of the steam network within the project boundary, in which the sources and the end users of the steam system are clearly illustrated.
2: The DOE is requested to include validation opinion on the accuracy and completeness of the project description in the validation report as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 64(b).
The data of coke oven gas are not consistent within the PDD and validation report. In particular, (i) the amount of the coke oven gas production; (ii) the amount of coke oven gas used in the absence of the project activity; (iii) the amount of coke oven gas released in the absence of the project activity. Please refer to page 10, 12, 13, 39 of the validation report, and page 2, 6 of the PDD.
The description of the pre-project scenario is not clear. In particular, whether the partial COG has been used for heat generation (page 6 of the PDD) or for tabular furnace and chiller usage (page 13 of validation report).
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the project starting date as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104 (a).
(i) The project starting date is not clear and not consistent. As per the description in page 43 of the validation report, the project starting date is 22/05/2005, whereas the PDD (page 35) indicates that the project started implementation in 2007; and (ii) The dates of the construction contract are not consistent. Please refer to page 22 and 23 of the PDD.
1: The PP/DOE are requested to complete all the PDD sections for the description of the project activity as per EB 48 Annex 60 paragraph 10 (a).
The steam system of the project activity is not clear. In particular, (i) in page 6 of the PDD, the description (the waste COG is combusted in gas-fired boilers to produce steam with medium temperature and pressure, and partial steam is pumped for heat supply and the rest steam is used for generating electricity) indicates that the steam is derived from the gas-fired boilers; (ii) whereas the Figure A.3 (PDD, page 7) indicates that the heat (in the form of steam) is derived from the steam turbine. Please also provide a diagram of the steam network within the project boundary, in which the sources and the end users of the steam system are clearly illustrated.
2: The DOE is requested to include validation opinion on the accuracy and completeness of the project description in the validation report as per VVM v1.2 paragraph 64(b).
The data of coke oven gas are not consistent within the PDD and validation report. In particular, (i) the amount of the coke oven gas production; (ii) the amount of coke oven gas used in the absence of the project activity; (iii) the amount of coke oven gas released in the absence of the project activity. Please refer to page 10, 12, 13, 39 of the validation report, and page 2, 6 of the PDD.
The description of the pre-project scenario is not clear. In particular, whether the partial COG has been used for heat generation (page 6 of the PDD) or for tabular furnace and chiller usage (page 13 of validation report).
3: The DOE is requested to provide information on the steps taken to validate the project starting date as per VVM v 1.2 paragraph 104 (a).
(i) The project starting date is not clear and not consistent. As per the description in page 43 of the validation report, the project starting date is 22/05/2005, whereas the PDD (page 35) indicates that the project started implementation in 2007; and (ii) The dates of the construction contract are not consistent. Please refer to page 22 and 23 of the PDD.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: