09:47 09 Jun 25
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue:The line diagrams in the monitoring report (page 6) and verification report (page 15) are not consistent with the line diagram in page 36 of the PDD. Further, please also illustrate the auxiliary consumption demand of the project activity (the additional electricity consumed due to the project activity) in the diagram.
2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: The DOE shall explain how it has verified that the grid is the only recipient of the electricity generated by the power plant of the project activity.
3: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (a) and (b))
Issue: The DOE shall explain whether and how it has verified the electricity supplied to the recipient (EGi,j,y) against the sales receipts as required by ACM0012 version 3.2 (page 40).
1: Scope: The monitoring report does not contain a description of the monitoring systems, quality assurance and/or quality control system employed by the project activity, data collection procedures (information flow including data generation, aggregation, recording, calculation and reporting), organizational structure, roles and responsibilities of personnel, emergency procedures for the monitoring system, and/or line diagrams showing all relevant monitoring points). (EB48 - Annex 68 paragraph 10 (a) (ii) & EB 54 Annex 34).
Issue:The line diagrams in the monitoring report (page 6) and verification report (page 15) are not consistent with the line diagram in page 36 of the PDD. Further, please also illustrate the auxiliary consumption demand of the project activity (the additional electricity consumed due to the project activity) in the diagram.
2: Scope: The verification report does not provide an assessment that all physical features of the proposed CDM project activity proposed in the registered PDD are in place and/or that the project participant has implemented and operated the proposed CDM project activity as per the registered PDD or the approved revised PDD. (VVM v.1.2 para 196)
Issue: The DOE shall explain how it has verified that the grid is the only recipient of the electricity generated by the power plant of the project activity.
3: Scope: The verification report does not indicate that the information provided in the monitoring report has been cross-checked with other sources such as plant log books, inventories, purchase records, laboratory analyses. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (a) and (b))
Issue: The DOE shall explain whether and how it has verified the electricity supplied to the recipient (EGi,j,y) against the sales receipts as required by ACM0012 version 3.2 (page 40).
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: