ࡱ>  bjbj jj{l4555h5ld6$w78@V8V8V8PLPLPLŠĊĊĊĊĊĊc ĊPLGLLPLPLĊ_V8V8BيV___PLtV8V8Š_PLŠ__g6 V87 t@-t/5^Q/Hws Vv s_Approved baseline methodology AM0014 Natural gas-based package cogeneration Source This methodology is based on the MGM natural gas-based package cogeneration project, Chile, whose baseline study, monitoring and verification plan and project design document were prepared by MGM International. For more information regarding the proposal and its consideration by the Executive Board please refer to case NM0018-rev: MGM baseline methodology Natural Gas-Based Package cogeneration Project on  HYPERLINK "http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/approved" http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/approved. This methodology refers to: Approved consolidated methodology ACM0002 Consolidated methodology for grid-connected electricity generation from renewable sources. Please go to  HYPERLINK "http://cdm.unfccc.int/goto/MPappmeth" http://cdm.unfccc.int/goto/MPappmeth. Selected approach from paragraph 48 of the CDM modalities and procedures Existing actual or historical emissions as applicable Applicability This methodology is applicable to natural gas-based cogeneration projects under the following conditions: The electricity and heat requirement of the consuming facility is generated in separate systems (i.e. electricity and heat in the baseline cannot be generated in another cogeneration facility) in the absence of the project activity; The cogeneration system is either third party cogeneration systems, i.e. not owned or operated by the consuming facility that receives the heat and electricity from project cogeneration systems or the cogeneration system is owned by the industrial user (henceforth referred to as self-owned) that consumes the heat and electricity from project cogeneration systems; The cogeneration system provides all or a part of the electricity and or heat demand of the consuming facility; No excess electricity is supplied to the power grid and no excess heat from the cogeneration system is provided to another user; In the case project activity displaces electricity from fossil fuel based, dedicated power plant(s), methodology can only claim reductions from only that fraction of displaced electricity from the baseline dedicated power plant(s), for which it can be demonstrated that project activity led to reduction in generation of baseline dedicated power plant (s). This baseline methodology shall be used in conjunction with the approved monitoring methodology AM0014 (Natural gas-based package cogeneration). Project activity The project activity encompasses the installation of a package cogeneration system whose input is natural gas from the gas pipeline, and whose outputs are electricity and heat supplied to an industry with demand for heat and electricity. The project activity avoids consumption of a fossil fuel for heat generation and displaces electricity from the grid or fossil fuel based, dedicated power plant(s). The displaced fossil fuel power plant(s) for electricity generation may use fuels with higher carbon intensity, including fuel oil, diesel. The displaced fossil fuel for heat production, hereafter referred to as the baseline fuel may be natural gas or some other type of fuel with higher carbon intensity than natural gas including (but not limited to) fuel oil and coal. Leakage The principal sources of leakage in the sense of emissions of GHG emissions outside the project boundary and attributable to the CDM project are the emission of methane from natural gas projection and pipeline leakage, associated with gas consumption of cogeneration system. Baseline Baseline emissions are those emissions that those associated with the production of heat and electricity that are offset by the output of the cogeneration system. Baseline emissions comprise five components: CO2 from combustion. CO2 emissions corresponding to the combustion of a baseline fuel that would have been used if the cogeneration system did not provide heat to the plant. CH4 from combustion. CH4 emission corresponding to the combustion of a baseline fuel that would have been used if the cogeneration system did not provide heat to the plant. N2O from combustion. N2O emissions corresponding to the combustion of a baseline fuel that would have been used if the cogeneration system did not provide heat to the plant. CH4 leaks during production of the baseline fuel. If the baseline fuel is natural gas, CH4 emissions from natural gas production and leaks in the transport and distribution pipeline supplying the plant and leaks in the gas distribution piping within the plant, associated with the natural gas consumption identified in item (a) above. For other types of fuel, the baseline emissions associated with production and transportation are assumed zero for simplification and conservatism. CO2 from electricity generation. CO2 emissions associated with the electricity that would have to be purchased from the power grid or CO2 emissions associated with the electricity that would have to be generated through dedicated fossil fuel power plant(s) if the cogeneration system did not provide electricity to the plant. The baseline emissions for the first four emission sources listed above are proportional to the amount of baseline fuel consumption in the plant that is offset by heat supplied by the natural gas cogeneration system. Each can be represented as the product of an emissions factor and an energy consumption, which depends on the heat output of the cogeneration system. The consumption of the fuel avoided in the baseline for the supply of heat is determined as follows: Annual energy consumption for heat supply at baseline plant, ABEC BF (GJ/year): ABECBF = CAHO (3.1) eb Where CAHO = annual heat output from cogeneration system (GJ/year), and eb = industrial boiler efficiency (fraction, lower heating value basis).The annual heat output from the cogeneration system (CAHO) is estimated on the basis of the heat output rate of the cogeneration system (CHOR) and an estimate of annual operating hours (AOH) of the cogeneration system. The formula is described below: Annual baseline energy consumption for heat supply, ABECBF (GJ/year): ABECBF (GJ/year) = CHOR x AOH (3.2) eb Where: CHOR = cogeneration system heat output rate (GJ/h), AOH = Annual operating hours (h/year), and eb = boiler efficiency (fraction, lower heating value basis) In order to be conservative, a high value of eb is chosen. The methodology proposes a default value of 0.90The value of CHOR may be determined from the specifications of the cogeneration system. A value of AOH should be determined from an engineering study of the proposed cogeneration system. Once the boiler energy consumption has been quantified, the four GHG emissions components (a to d, above) can be determined, as indicated below. Baseline CO2 emissions from combustion of baseline fuel for heat supply Baseline CO2 emissions from combustion of baseline fuel for heat supply, BEth (tonnesCO2/year): BEth = ABECBF. EFBF (3.3) Where: ABECBF = annual energy consumption for heat supply at baseline plant (GJ/year), and EFBF = CO2 emission factor of the fuel used to generate heat (t CO2/GJ)A value of EFBF needs to be estimated from the following data sources. The numbers indicate a hierarchy in data to be used, with # 1 being the best. If # 1 data are not available, # 2 data should be chosen. If these are not available, # 3 data should be chosen. 1. National GHG inventory 2. IPCC, fuel type and technology specific 3. IPCC, near fuel type and technology Baseline methane emissions from combustion of baseline fuel for heat supply to plant Baseline methane emissions from combustion of baseline fuel for heat supply, BEmet comb (tonne CH4/year): BE met comb (tonneCH4/year) = ABECBF x MEF (3.4) 106 Where: ABECBF = annual baseline energy consumption for heat supply (GJ/year), and MEF = methane emission factor for baseline fuel combustion (kg CH4/TJ), lower heating value basis) In units of carbon dioxide equivalent, BE equity met comb (tonne CO2 eq/year) BE equiv met comb (tonne CO2 equiv / year) = BE met comb x GWP (CH4) (3.5) Where GWP (CH4) = global warming potential of methane = 21The value of MEF needs to be estimated from the following data sources. The numbers indicate a hierarchy in data to be used with # 1 being the best. If # 1 data are not available, #2 data should be chosen. 1. IPCC, fuel type and technology specific 2. IPCC, near fuel type and technology c) Baseline nitrous oxide emissions from combustion of baseline fuel for heat supply to plant Baseline nitrous oxide emissions from combustion of baseline fuel for heat supply, BEN2O comb (tonne N2O/year): BEN2O comb (tonne CH4/year) =ABECBF . NEF (3.6) 106 Where: ABECBF = annual baseline energy consumption for heat supply (GJ/year), and NEF = nitrous emission factor for fuel combustion (kg N2O/TJ), lower heating value basis) In units of carbon dioxide equivalent, BE equity met comb (tonne CO2 eq/year) BE equiv N2Ocomb (tonne CO2 equiv / year) = BE N2O comb x WP (CH4) (3.7) GWP (N2O) = global warming potential of nitrous oxide = 310The value of NEF needs to be estimated the following data sources. The numbers indicate a hierarchy in data to be used, with # 1 being the best. If # 1 data are not available, # 2 data should be chosen. 1. IPCC, fuel type and technology specific 2. IPCC, near fuel type and technology d) Baseline methane emissions from natural gas production and pipeline leaks in the transport and distribution This section is applicable only for projects that displace natural gas in the baseline for heat generation. For baseline fuel other than natural gas, Bet h_fug is assumed zero for simplification and to be chosen. The value of MLR needs to be estimated from the following data sources. The numbers indicate a hierarchy in data to be used, with # 1 being the best. If # 1 data are not available, # 2 data should be chosen. 1. National estimates (if available) 2. IPCC estimates of fugitive emissions from oil and natural gas activities. Baseline methane emissions from natural gas production and leakage in transport and distribution, corresponding to heat supply, BE th fug tonne CH4/year): BE th fug (tonneCH4/year) = ABECBF x MEF (3.8) 103 Where: MLR = Methane Leakage Rate in natural gas production, transport and distribution leakage, including leaks at the industrial site (kg CH4/GJ natural gas energy consumption, lower heating value basis). ABECNG = annual baseline natural gas energy consumption for heat supply (GJ/year) In units of carbon dioxide equivalent, BE th equiv fug (tonne CO2 equiv/year): BE th equiv fug (tonne CO2 - equiv / year) = BE th fug GWP (CH4) (3.9) Where GWP (CH4) = is defined as before = 21e) Baseline emissions of CO2 from electricity supply to industrial plant that is offset by electricity supplied from cogeneration system The final item of GHG emissions in the baseline arises from electricity, corresponding to the emissions avoided at the power plants supplying the public grid / CO2 emissions associated with the electricity that would have to be generated through dedicated fossil fuel power plant(s). The relevant formulae are described below: 1. Electricity Displaced from Public System: Baseline carbon dioxide emissions for electricity supplied, BE elec grid (tonne CO2/year): BE elec grid (tonne CO2/year) = CEO. BEF elec grid (3.10) 103 Where: CEO = cogeneration electricity output (MWh/year), and BEF elec grid = baseline CO2 emissions factor for electricity from public supply (kg CO2/MWh) OR 2. Electricity displaced, that would have to be generated through dedicated fossil fuel power plant(s): Baseline carbon dioxide emissions for electricity supplied, BE elec fossil fuel (tonne CO2/year): BE elec fossil fuel (tonne CO2/year) = CEO. BEF elec fossil fuel (3.11) 103 Where: CEO = Cogeneration Electricity Output (MWh/year), and BEF elec fossil fuel = Baseline CO2 emissions factor for electricity from the dedicated fossil fuel power plant(s) (kg CO2/MWh) BEF elec fossil fuel = EMBED Equation.3  (3.12)  EMBED Equation.3  = Power generated by sources i (in MWh), by relevant power sources n, sources delivering electricity to the consuming facility  EMBED Equation.3  = Specific CO2 emissions factor of the fossil fuel power generation sources n (in terms of kg/ MWh), sources delivering electricity to the consuming facility  EMBED Equation.3  = Number of fossil fuel power generation sources The actual baseline emissions are determined by monitoring cogeneration electricity output (CEO) and calculating BEelec. For an a priori estimation of the baseline CO2 emissions for electricity supply to the plant, CEO is determined by the cogeneration electric power output (CPO) and annual operating hours (AOH), in a manner similar to Eq. (3.2) for heat output, and is described below. Annual electricity generation from the cogeneration system, CEO (MWh/year): CEO (MWh / year) = CEO x AOH (3.13) 103 Where CEO = cogeneration system net power output capacity (MWe), and AOH = annual operating hours of cogeneration system (h/year)To estimate BEF elec, the CO2 emission factor for electricity supply, users of this methodology shall refer to the Consolidated Baseline Methodology for Zero-emissions Grid-Connected Electricity Generation from Renewable Sources where different ways of determining CO2 emission factors for electricity supply from the grid are provided, or to the Simplified Methodology for Small-scale CDM Project activities (in case electricity displaced is less than or equal to 15 MW equivalent). Total baseline emissions are given by the sum of the components analyzed above: BE total = BE th + BE equiv met comb + BE equiv N2O comb + BE th equiv fug + BE elec grid / fossil fuel (3.14) Emission Reductions Emission reductions are calculated as the difference between baseline and project emissions, taking into account any adjustments for leakage: Project emissions are those associated with natural gas consumption by the cogeneration system, including CO2, CH4, and N2O emissions from natural gas combustion and CH4 emissions from natural gas production and pipeline leakage, associated with the gas consumption of the cogeneration system. Additionality First likely alternative baseline scenarios are described: Industrial plant continues to operate with equipment replacement as needed with no change in equipment efficiency (The frozen-efficiency scenario). Industrial plant continues to operate with improved efficiency new equipment at the time of equipment replacement using a less carbon intensive fuel. Industrial plant upgrades the thermal energy generating equipment and therefore increases the efficiency of boiler(s) immediately. The heat and or electricity demand of the industrial plant is reduced through improvements in end-use efficiency. Installation of a cogeneration system owned by the industrial plant. Installation of a package cogeneration system owned by a company other than the industrial plant (The proposed project). Installation of a cogeneration system by a third party. The project developer can demonstrate additionality by selecting one of the following two options: - Option 1: apply Step 2 of the latest version of the Tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality (Investment Analysis). - Option 2: Methodology-specific process for determination of additionality as follows: Four additionality tests are applied. The first two tests are applicable to any cogeneration ownership scenario. The third test is specific to the package cogeneration case where the cogeneration system is owned by a party other than the industry using the heat and electricity from the system. The fourth test is specific to the package cogeneration case for the self-owned cogeneration system. In the case of self owned Cogeneration project activities the project activity is additional if all the four additionality tests result in project being assessed as additional, whereas, only the first three tests need be applied in the case of third party ownership 1. Are there technological barriers to cogeneration in the country? Additionality test 1 is applied by following the flow chart below. A low market share of cogeneration means that there is insufficient infrastructure to support installation and maintenance of such systems, acting as a technological barrier to project participants.  2. A. Institutional barrier: Are there institutional barriers to cogeneration in general? Additionality test 2A is applied by following the flow chart below. It should be noted that even if preferential tariffs or other incentives do exist, they may not be sufficient to promote cogeneration. A serious barrier may be present, especially in deregulated power systems. All electricity users may have to pay the maximum demand charge for the whole year. Thus, when the cogeneration system is not operating (due to routine maintenance or forced outage), the user of electricity would have to purchase the electricity from the power grid. While this period may be small, the purchase may involve paying for the power demand (dW) for the whole year. This is a significant penalty for users of cogeneration systems. If institutional barriers are not present, but there are no specific incentives to cogeneration, then the test indicated is inconclusive with repect to institutional barrier A. Other barriers (such as technological barrier or institutional barrier B) will need to be considered to determine additionality.     2B. Institutional barrier for ESCOs: Are there institutional barriers to the package cogeneration operational context? In other words, is there enough experience in which one company installs a cogeneration system at the location of a separate energy user? The traditional practice is for an industrial user to meet their electricity and natural gas demand by purchases from power and gas companies respectively. In a packaged cogeneration system, the institutional arrangement is very different. In this case, the project developer invests in and installs the cogeneration system at the industrial user site, and provides electricity and heat to that user. This institutional arrangement requires project developer to have special management resources and organizational capacity, and for the industrial energy user to accept this arrangement. Where such experience is lacking, promoting the new arrangement involves a significant institutional barrier. Additionality test 2B is applied by following the flow chart below:     2C. Institutional barriers for Industrial Users: Are there institutional barriers to the Package cogeneration operational context? In other words is there enough experience in which an industrial user can install and operate a cogeneration system at its plant premises? The traditional practice is for an industrial user to meet their electricity and natural gas demand by purchases from power and gas plants respectively. In this case, the industrial user installs and operates the cogeneration system for use at its own site. This arrangement requires the industrial user to have specific expertise and knowledge of cogeneration systems. Where such experience is lacking, promoting the new arrangement involves a significant institutional barrier. Additionality test 2C is applied by the following flow chart below:  If the above additionality tests determine that a package cogeneration system is additional with respect to scenarios where no cogeneration system, scenarios 1 to 4 remain as baseline options. The selection cannot be made without a substantial analysis. Therefore, a conservative approach is taken by assuming a high value for eb in Eq. 3.2 to calculate the baseline emissions. This assumption implies reduced natural gas consumption in the baseline, and therefore reduced emission reductions compared to option 1-3. Option 4 is discounted for by determining the baseline ex-post on the basis of actual heat and electricity of the industrial plant. Approved monitoring methodology AM0014 Natural gas-based package cogeneration Source This methodology is based on the MGM Natural gas-based package cogeneration Project, Chile, whose baseline study, monitoring and verification plan and project design document were prepared by MGM International. For more information regarding the proposal and its consideration by the Executive Board please refer to case NM0018-rev: MGM baseline methodology Natural Gas-Based Package cogeneration Project on  HYPERLINK "http://cdm.unfcc.int/methodologies/approved" http://cdm.unfcc.int/methodologies/approved Applicability This methodology is applicable to natural gas-based cogeneration projects under the following conditions: The baseline comprises different sources for both electricity and heat for the consuming facility (i.e. electricity and heat in the baseline cannot be generated in another cogeneration facility), The cogeneration system is a third party cogeneration systems, i.e. not own or operated by the consuming facility that receives the project heat and electricity or the cogeneration system is owned by the industrial user (henceforth referred to as self-owned) that consumes the project heat and electricity; The cogeneration system provides all or a part of the electricity and or heat demand of the consuming facility; No excess electricity is supplied to the power grid and no excess heat from the cogeneration system is provided to another user; In the case project activity displaces electricity from fossil fuel based, dedicated power plant(s), methodology can only be used as long as displaced electricity from the captive power plant(s) will not be used by other users during the crediting period of the project activity in question. This monitoring methodology shall be used in conjunction with the approved baseline methodology AM0014 (Natural gas-based package cogeneration). Monitoring Methodology The monitoring methodology involves monitoring of the following: The natural gas consumption at the cogeneration system; Heat production at the cogeneration system; Electricity production at the cogeneration system; Fate of the electricity displaced by the project activity, in the case project activity displaces electricity from fossil fuel based, dedicated power plant(s). Project emissions correspond to natural gas combustion by the cogeneration system, and includes the same four components as in the baseline (CO2, CH4 and N2O emissions from combustion) and CH4 emissions from natural gas production and leaks in the transport and distribution pipeline supplying the plant and leaks in the gas distribution piping within the plant, associated with the natural gas consumption. Each of these is proportional to the natural gas consumption in the cogeneration system, which is monitored. Emissions are then calculated as follows: a) CO2 emissions from natural gas combustion in cogeneration system Carbon dioxide emissions from natural gas combustion in the cogeneration system, Ecs (tonnesCO2/year): Ecs = tonne CO2 / year) AECNG. EFNG (4.1) 103 Where AECNG = annual energy consumption of natural gas in cogeneration system (GJ/year), and EFNG = CO2 emission factor of natural gas (kg CO2/GJ, lower heating value basis)b) Methane emissions from natural gas combustion in cogeneration system A certain amount of methane is generated in the combustion of natural gas. These are generally expressed in terms of natural gas energy consumption. Emissions are estimated using formulae described below: Methane emissions from natural gas combustion in the cogeneration system, E met comb E met comb= tonne CO2 / year) AEC NG. MEF (4.2) 103 Where AECNG = annual energy consumption of natural gas in cogeneration system (GJ/year), and MEF = methane emission factor for natural gas combustion (kg CH4/TJ, lower heating value basis) In units of carbon dioxide equivalent emission, E equiv met comb (tonne CO2 equiv/year) E equiv met comb (tonne CO2 equiv / year) = E met comb GWP (CH4) (4.3) Where GWP (CH4) = global warming potential of methane = 21c) Nitrous oxide emissions from natural gas combustion in cogeneration system A certain amount of nitrous oxide is generated in the combustion of natural gas. These are generally expressed in terms of natural gas energy consumption. Emissions are estimated using formulae similar to those for methane emissions in combustion, and are described below: Nitrous oxide emissions from natural gas combustion in the cogeneration system, EN2O comb (tonne N2O / year), are given by: E N2O comb (tonne CH4 / year) = AECNG NEF (4.4) 103 Where AECNG = annual energy consumption of natural gas in the cogeneration system (GJ/Year), and NEF = nitrous oxide emission factor for natural gas combustion (kg N2O/TJ, lower heating value basis) In units of carbon dioxide equivalent emission, E equiv N2O comb (tonne CO2 equiv/year) E equiv N2O comb (tonne CO2 equiv / year) = E N2O comb GWP (N2O) (4.5) Where GWP (N2O) = global warming potential of nitrous oxide = 310d) Methane emissions from natural gas production and pipeline leaks in the transport and distribution of natural gas, including leakage within the industrial plant These baseline emissions are associated with natural gas consumption in the cogeneration system. The procedure for estimating these emissions is described below: Methane emissions from natural gas production and leakage in transport and distribution, corresponding to fuel used in cogeneration system, Efug (tonne CH4 / years), are given by: E fug (tonne CH4 / year) AECNG MLR (4.6) 103 Where AECNG = is defined as before, and MLR = methane leakage rate in natural gas production, transport and distribution leakage, including leaks at the industrial site (kg CH4/GJ natural gas energy consumption, lower heating value basis) Convert methane emissions to carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, E equiv fug (tonne CO2 equiv / year) E equiv fug (tonne CO2 equiv / year) = E fug GWP (CH4) (4.7) Where GWP (CH4) = is defined as before = 21.Total project emissions are given by the sum of the components analyzed above: Etotal = ECS + Eequiv met comb + Eequiv N2O comb + Eequiv jug (4.8) The equations used to estimate project emissions are structurally very similar to those used in order to determine baseline emission. Project emissions are determined from natural gas consumption by the cogeneration. Baseline emissions depend on heat and electricity output from the cogeneration system that is supplied to the industrial plant, and are determined in a dynamic manner from monitored data using Equations leading up to Eq. 3.15. By considering baseline and project emissions, emissions reductions are determined in a straight forward manner. Parameters to be monitored ID numberData type Data variableData unitMeasured (m), calculated (c) or estimated (e)Recording frequencyProportion of data to be monitoredHow will the data be archived? (electronic/paper)For how long is archived data to be kept?Comment1Volume of natural gas consumedMECNGm3mMonthly100%Paper (field record) electronic (spreadsheet)Paper: 1 year, Electronic: 7 years2Cogeneration electricity supplied to industrial plantMCEOMWhmMonthly100%Electronic (spreadsheet)Electronic: 7 years3Cogeneration heat supplied to industrial plantMCHOGJmMonthly 100%Electronic (spreadsheet)Paper: 1 year Electronic: 7 years4Electricity generated by baseline dedicated power plants(s)Level of utilization of the baseline dedicated power plant(s)MWhmannual100%Paper (field record) electronic (spreadsheet)Paper: 1 year Electronic: 7 yearsPlease see note 1 below this table. Note 1: During each verification a report has to be produced, showing that electricity produced by the baseline dedicated power plant(s) have been reduced by at least the same amount as the electricity generated by the project activity cogeneration plant. If not, the credits for electricity generation has to be reduced by equivalent of excess electricity produced by the baseline dedicated power plant(s). This shall be estimated using the historic generation of the baseline dedicated power plant(s) and electricity production of the dedicated power plant(s) during the crediting period, if operational. This is applicable to cases where the baseline dedicated power plant(s) are not scrapped and continue to operate along with the project activity cogeneration plant. Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA) Procedures DataUncertainly level of data (High/Medium/Low)Are QA/QC procedures planned for these data?Outline explanation why QA/QC procedures are or are not being planned1LowYesThese data will be used as supporting information to calculate emission reductions by project activity2LowYesThese data will be used as supporting information to calculate emission reductions by project activity3LowYesThese data will be used as supporting information to calculate emission reductions by project activity4LowYesThese data will be used as supporting information to calculate emission reductions by project activity     PAGE  CDM Executive Board AM0014 / Version 04 Sectoral Scope: 01 and 04 EB 33 PAGE   PAGE 1/ NUMPAGES 19 CDM Executive Board AM0014 / Version 04 Sectoral Scope: 1 and 4 EB 33 Yes No Yes No One or more Yes All No Does the country have a study quantifying its economic cogeneration potential? Has 10% of the economic potential been reached? Cogeneration faces technological barriers Is installed cogeneration capacity more than 5% of total installed thermal generating capacity? Is installed cogeneration capacity more than 500MW? Is installed number of cogeneration more than 25? Cogeneration does not face technological barriers Cogeneration faces technological barriers Yes No Yes No Does cogenerator receive preferential tariffs, financing and/or fiscal benefits compared to other generators? Cogeneration does not face institutional barrier A Does cogenerator face economic penalties when the system is down, penalties that are more onerous than those faced by other generators when they are down and unjustified on a purely economic basis? Cogeneration faces institutional barrier A Test is inconclusive with respect to institutional barrier A No Yes No Yes Have energy service companies (ESCOs) installed package cogeneration systems at energy users locations? Have ESCOs conducted at least 20 recent installations in the country or a number of installations representing 5% of total installed thermal generating capacity in the country? Package cogeneration does not face institutional barrier B Package cogeneration faces institutional barrier B No Yes No Yes Have industrial energy users installed package cogeneration systems at their site locations or at any of their associated companies (mother, sister, daughter) in the same count5ry? Have industrial energy users conducted at least 20 recent installations in the country or a number of installations representing 5% of total installed thermal generating capacity in the country? Cogeneration by industrial user faces institutional barrier B Cogeneration by industrial user does not face institutional barrier B X./0\]EFGklo aftvw#$%9:;,->@A'+-0ŽCJH*mH @sH @ CJmH @sH @CJH* 5CJH*\j)CJU0JCJjCJU jCJUCJ 5CJ\I%&OPWX_`|}nokT U 4   & F0`0 & F0`0$a$ t#p' k $$Ifa$$If & F 8^04i#$ST?@" # b d n o w !!p!r!w!x!!!!!!!-#####$$$ $$$$$[$`$a$$$$$;%<%]%%%%CJH* >*CJH* 5CJH*\CJH* 5>*CJ\ 5CJ\CJ>*CJTklhi$U\~|smmmmmm$If $$Ifa$$If $$Ifa$$a$d$$Ifl#$ t0644 la ~<  w !!!m!n!tkkkkk $$Ifa$ $$Ifa$$If $h^ha$ & F b$$Ifl#$ t0644 la n!!!""#-###a$$$qiicc$If$If$ & F hh^ha$$a$f$$IfTl#$ t0644 la $$Ifa$ $$$$]%^%%%&&N&O&'H'o''d$$Ifl#$ t0$644 la$If$If%%%%%%%%%%% & &&N&O&\&`&o' (#($(+(3(4(=(?(G(Q(R(Z(^(`(f((((((((())))))))))*** *#*+*4*5*N*T*[*\***+#,>......... 6CJH*6CJCJH* 5>*CJ\>*CJ 6>*CJH* 6>*CJ5CJCJH*CJ 5CJ\ 5CJH*\L'=((((B)C))))))T*U***d$$Ifl#$ t0$644 la$If$If*b+++#,,--=.>..N///U0V00000i11$If$If$a$ 0^`0........../H/M/N///00Z0\000000000000111#1&1)1/17181c1i1v1w111111222g3333333333333344444#4ƽﶽ 6>*CJH*56CJH*] 56CJ] 5CJH*\ 5CJH*5CJCJH* 5>*CJ\ >*CJH*>*CJCJH*CJ 5CJ\G112g333c=%$d%d&d'dNOPQ) $d%d&d'dNOPQ 0^`0b$$Ifl#$ t0644 la33j44444=5>5B55 666677($d%d&d'd7$8$H$NOPQ%$d%d&d'dNOPQ#$d%d&d'dNOPQ#4c4d4i4j444444444444446575>5B555555566 6 66666)6*636<6@6A6L6~666666677 7 7777%7&7|7}77777777 >*CJH*>*CJ5CJ 5CJH*\ 56CJ] 56CJCJH*56CJH*] 6CJH*] 6CJ]CJH* 5>*CJ\ 5CJ\CJ6CJC7777[8\899\9{SSSS'<<$d%d&d'dNOPQ/*<<$d%d&d'dNOPQ^*`+<<$d%d&d'dNOPQ`($d%d&d'd7$8$H$NOPQ7777777777777777[8\8]8p8q8r8s8888999'9(9)9*9[9\99ȿyui`j CJEHUjI CJPJUVCJH*jCJEHU+j*CJPJ]5CJPJ\j2CJEHPJU+j>?.?@@+Ab$$Ifl#$ t0644 la$If$If7$8$H$999999::5:9:r:u::::;";#;/;D;M;;;;;;}<<<<U>n>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ??.?(@)@-@.@5@6@d@e@@@qI}IMMMMMNNNRRRR RjCJUmHnHu56CJH*]56B*CJH*]phCJH* 5>*CJ\>*CJ5CJ 5CJ\CJH*CJ 6CJ]H+AAUBBJCC DADBDD+EE!HeHqI~IIIIIIIIIIII$a$ & F 8^IIIIIIIJLMMMMMMNNNNNNN N N N N NOQRRRRRR R#R$R%R&R'R(R)R+R,R-R.R`RaRBS&UjUtUuUvUwUxUyUzU$a$ R"R)R*RjUsUVVXiXZZ>Z?Z@ZkZlZmZ{Z__aaaaaaaaFcKcLccccccccccccdd dddddhdndddddde%e'e)e.e/eſ𹲹𝪤 56CJ\ 6CJH*6CJCJH* 6>*CJH* 6>*CJ 5CJH*5CJ 5CJH*\0JCJj CJU jCJU 5CJ\CJH*CJjCJUmHnHu>zU{U|U}U~UUUUUX9XbXiXmZ{ZZ[\M]]^__ & F & F0`0$ & F0`0a$ & F0`0$a$$a$__`A`t`aEccccndddeeve$If$If & F0`0/eUeVeveefffffffggg gUgZg[ggggggshthhhhhhhhhhhiii$i,i-iUi[ihiiiiijJkKkSkTk\k]khkvkxkkkkkkkkkûûñ6>*CJH*mHsH6>*CJmHsHCJH*mHsH CJmHsH 5CJH*\ 6CJH*6CJCJH* 5>*CJ\ 6>*CJH* 6>*CJ 5CJ\CJH*CJAveweefff[ggghMhhh[ii$If$Ifd$$Ifl#$ t0644 laiiijjJkvkk,llllmmmmn$If$If$a$b$$Ifl#$ t0644 lakkk(l*l+l6l9l;llllllmmEmGmUmVm_m`mmmom~mmmmmmmmmmnneoopppp(p)p2p5p7p;ppppppppptquqqqqrɺ᪣ɜ 5>*CJ\ 6>*CJH* 6>*CJ6CJH*mHsH6CJmHsH 5CJH*\ 5CJ\CJH* 6CJH*6CJCJH*CJ CJmHsH5>*CJ\mHsH5CJ\mHsH=nnndoeoppppqrrrr s $If^$If$Ifb$$Ifl#$ t0644 larr r rrr&r1r2rGrJrSrTrUrrrrrrrr s sssss's+s9s=sFsssuuuvvvvvSwTwwwXxYx\y]yd|||F}}})~*~~~  jUCJH*CJH*56CJ\]5CJ\mHsH6CJH*mHsH6CJmHsH 6CJH*6CJ 5CJH*\ 5CJ\CJE ssuuuuuuuuu,v@vcvvvvvvvvvvvw/wRwSw0Ff $If7$8$H$SwTwVwwwwwwwwwwwwx x xxxx5xWxXxYx[xxxxFfFf$IfFfxxxxy8y\y]y^y|||||E} $$Ifa$Ff$IfE}F}H}L}P}>333 $$Ifa$$$IfTl\S 2Oe  t(0644 l` aP}}}}}6++ $$Ifa$$$IfTl\S 2Oe  t(0644 l` a$If}})~*~,~+$$IfTl\S 2Oe  t(0644 l` a$If $$Ifa$,~0~4~~~+$$IfTl\S 2Oe  t(0644 l` a$If $$Ifa$~~~~ $If $$Ifa$ >75555$a$$$IfTl\S 2Oe  t(0644 l` a$%&]x&`#$J R C$Eƀ R $ d7$8$H$]da$7$8$H$&`#$"#$&;I]x67ab÷xsnnCJaJCJaJ5CJOJQJ^JaJCJ0JCJmHnHu0JCJj0JCJUCJOJQJ\^JaJCJOJQJ\^JaJ5CJOJQJ^JaJCJOJQJ^JaJ5CJOJQJ\^JaJCJOJQJ^JaJ5CJOJQJ\^JaJ0J j0JU+MPstԁ3 0  R $d7$8$H$]da$7$8$H$$a$67abƒRR$ & F hhEƀVK&()^ha$R$ & F hhEƀVK&()^ha$$a$ ()[\$%m6789_` 0 $a$R$ & F hhEƀVK&()^ha$b()[\{NeΌό]^ 5CJ\CJaJCJaJ!`az{NO.'()IJKde$a$ 0 eΌό'Zgȏɏʏ]^ 0 $a$^$a$$a$(&P1h/ =!"#$% (&P1h/ =!"#$% . 0&P1h0= /!"#$% )DyK -http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/approvedyK Zhttp://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/approved DyK %http://cdm.unfccc.int/goto/MPappmethyK Jhttp://cdm.unfccc.int/goto/MPappmethDd0\  c $A? ?#" `2vT6>T`{=v`!vT6>T`{= H`\xڥS=KP&i`lEDXQQj .VXiZk v"".W-^8{;慀<)`CS!! Ð%2!^^jLQ4IY2X)3k*9I.NEQME")Z1l fcT)Zi-s=CRFBkRV% зHT?__({ON3rq5w`IiKUą|ώ9:-S(r76\E1!C.Ȃ^篪'N"׼'c|Ǒ9ǐwo ‹q@gܠZ|h}VL9/` )`DdD|\  c $A? ?#" `2fy-GV4a*B`!:y-GV4a*`0xcdd`` @c112BYL%bpu/b|iXt9FOfμJY 1y32@M`savuKEw9.u\KP``CI)$5a\E./ _Dd0  # A2=B t|aUF|eUO `!B t|aUF|eU:@`!xcdd`` @c112BYL%bpu?@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[\]^_`abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz{|}~Root Entry F0. Data WordDocumentObjectPool0;-0._1245492913F0;-0;-Ole CompObjfObjInfo !"#$%&'()*+,-./012346 FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q™< (PG i,n *SEF i,n )  " PG i,n "Equation Native _1241040106 F0*>-0*>-Ole CompObj f FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q&XDT  PG i,n FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39qObjInfo Equation Native  B_1245492626 F0*>-0*>-Ole  CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native F_1241040075F0*>-0*>-*l SEF i,n FMicrosoft Equation 3.0 DS Equation Equation.39q @{4G nOle CompObjfObjInfoEquation Native )(((44 la$$Ifl  X8")h.4( t056((((44 la$$Ifl  X8")h.4( t056((((44 la$$Ifl  X8")h.4( t056((((44 la1TablesSummaryInformation(DocumentSummaryInformation8 0CompObj5jOh+'0$0@ Xd    BRevision to the approved baseline methodology AM0014 version 02hevi14DEC2005-9283134416ved4DE4DEnormal0Jane Stickdorn34neMicrosoft Word 9.06@ @v@ j@)xe՜.+,D՜.+,p, hp  AONEi3| BRevision to the approved baseline methodology AM0014 version 02 TitleHx _PID_HLINKS_AdHocReviewCycleID_EmailSubject _AuthorEmail_AuthorEmailDisplayName_ReviewingToolsShownOnceA}?,http://cdm.unfcc.int/methodologies/approvedK%http://cdm.unfccc.int/goto/MPappmethG-http://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/approvedRequest for revision received on AM0014 ver. 3 - Revision is proposed to include project that displaces fossil fuel based systems in the baseline generating electricity / power other than Grid based powersAbhishek.Goyal@tuev-sued.deGoyal, Abhishekoya  FMicrosoft Word Document MSWordDocWord.Document.89q i<@< NormalCJ_HaJmH nHsH tH<A@< Default Paragraph Font.U@.  Hyperlink >*B*ph,@, Header  !&)@&  Page Number, @", Footer  !>V@1> FollowedHyperlink >*B* phB 3 Char Char Char Char Char Char Char1 Char Char Char dCJOJPJQJaJtH @R@  Balloon TextCJOJQJ^JaJ KEpd8 N j G  $%&'( KEpd8 N j G      q*T%&OPWX_`|}nokTU4 t#p' klhi$U\~<wmn-a ]!^!!!""N"O"#H#o##=$$$$B%C%%%%%%T&U&&&b'''#(())=*>**N+++U,V,,,,,i---.g////j00000=1>1B11 222233333[4\455\5]56/777 8l8m8U::;.;<<+==U>>J?? @A@B@@+AA!DeDqE~EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEFHIIIIIIJJJJJJJ J J J J JKMNNNNN N#N$N%N&N'N(N)N+N,N-N.N`NaNBO&QjQtQuQvQwQxQyQzQ{Q|Q}Q~QQQQQT9TbTiTmV{VVWXMYYZ[[[\A\t\]E____n```aavawaabbb[cccdMddd[eeeeffJgvgg,hhhhimiijjjdkekllllmnnnn ooqqqqqqqqq,r@rcrrrrrrrrrrrs/sRsSsTsVsssssssssssst t tttt5tWtXtYt[tttttttu8u\u]u^uxxxxxEyFyHyLyPyyyyyy)z*z,z0z4zzzzzz {{{{{{{${%{&{]{x{{{{{{{{{{{|||||M||||P}s}t}}3~~~~67ab()[\$%m6789_`az{NO.'()IJKdeΈψ'Zgȋɋʋ]^0000000000000000000 00 0 0 0 00`0000000 0 0 0 0 00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00@00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00@0@0@0 0@0@0@00@0@0@0@0@0@0@00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00@0@0@000@0@00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00@00@0@0@0@00@00@0@00000@00@00@0@00@0@0000@00@0@00000@00@0@0@0000@0@0@0@00@00@00@0@0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0@0@0@0@00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@000@0@0@000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00@0@00@0@0 0 0 0 0 0@0@0@0 0 0 0 000@0@00@0@0@0@00@0@0@0@0@00@0@0@0@0@000@0@0@0@00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0000@0@0000@`0@00@00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0 00@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00000000 0 0 0000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0000000000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@000@0@0@00000000000@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@0@00000000000 { 0%.#479 R/ekrbOSX[^`bfilny} k~n!$'*137\9+AIRzU_vein sSwxE}P}},~~ `e^PRTUVWYZ\]_acdeghjkmopqrstuvwxz{|~Q/\Fk333333\4p4r45'5)5V?VkVXX::::X { !!!  2./Xb$Ix޸U+P=yDb$ IϋzzU)@@ )- (  H  #   H  #   H  #   b  C "` H  #  b   C  "` b   C  "` NB   S DNB   S DTB   c $LDTB  c $LDTB  c $LDH  #  H  #   b  C  "`  H  #   b  C  "`  H  #   NB  S D NB  S D NB  S DH  #  H  #  H  #  b  C "` b  C "` NB   S DNB ! S DNB " S DNB # S DH $ # $ H % # %' H & # && H ' # '" H ( # (% NB ) S D$NB * S D#NB + S D!NB , S D NB - S DB S  ?H0(  qErEsEtEuEvEwExEyEzE{E|EIIIIIIIIIJNNNNNN N!N)NjQkQlQmQnQoQpQqQrQ tt |t pPt  t  t t P!h tP`X |t`p|t` t(#$th 8 t Xth t8Tp thTh tXtp th t8t-u\th0 8t#  t"8tH!t$,t 0 nt!th`th[ wt$(#t,c: t+ vt'N jt*P t P t)P P <t(rat&<xt t% t +,n [[LM " "$$%%J&N&++,,,, --)-+-9/9/0011{2|222u3u33333334444H4H4444444446677;;;; J JNNNN(N(N)N)N*N*NTTReTeffvggggggggggmi~iiiiiiiii ooooo'o*o4o5o9o z\ WjfJ[j "ZQ\Ȑdm o+"/wR}/G +"^`o(() ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.808^8`0o(. ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.808^8`0o() ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.^`o() ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`B*OJQJo(phhHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hH808^8`0o() ^`hH. pLp^p`LhH. @ @ ^@ `hH. ^`hH. L^`LhH. ^`hH. ^`hH. PLP^P`LhH.h^`B*OJQJo(phhHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHh^`B*OJQJo(phhHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohpp^p`OJQJo(hHh@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJo(hHh^`OJQJ^Jo(hHohPP^P`OJQJo(hHhh^h`B*OJQJo(ph ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o \ \ ^\ `OJQJo( ,,^,`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo(808^8`0OJPJQJ^Jo(-^`OJQJ^Jo(hHopp^p`OJQJo(hH@ @ ^@ `OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHo^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJo(hH^`OJQJ^Jo(hHoPP^P`OJQJo(hHhh^h`B*OJQJo(ph ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o \ \ ^\ `OJQJo( ,,^,`OJQJo( ^`OJQJo(o ^`OJQJo( \ Wu*)O[ILt"/wR}rdmZQ\fJ[oG  \        Y5        *--6l8m888{9:;(<)<]_vawabeefjjdkeknnqqqqq,r@rcrrrrrrrrrrrs/sRsSsTsVsssssssssssst t tttt5tWtXtYt[tttttttu8u\u]uxxxxEyFyHyLyPyyyyyy)z*z,z0z4zzzzzz {{   U U U U@p@UnknownJane StickdornRobertoSchaefferGz Times New Roman5Symbol3& z Arial; BatangG MS Mincho-3 fg5& z!Tahoma?5 z Courier New;Wingdings"1h&&&xe3d3!x0d|XvA@ 2qKXARevision to the approved baseline methodology AM0014  version 0214DEC2005-9283134416Jane Stickdorn