CDM-EB47-A61-INFO

CDM Executive Board decision and documentation framework

Version 05.0

TABLE OF CONTENTS                                                                                                          Page

1....... Introduction.... 3

1.1...... Background... 3

1.2...... Objective... 3

2....... Scope and entry into force.... 3

2.1...... Scope... 3

2.2...... Entry into force... 3

3....... Decision hierarchy between the CMP and the Board.... 3

4....... Board decision classes.... 4

5....... Document types.... 4

6....... Board decision classes and document types.... 4

7....... Control and limitation of documents issued by the Board.... 4

1. Introduction

1.1. Background

1. The Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (CMP), at its fourth session, requested the Executive Board of the clean development mechanism (CDM) (hereinafter referred to as the Board) to improve transparency and consistency in its decision-making, through clarifying the hierarchy of its decisions and classifying its documentation as a means of achieving a more transparent, equitable and consistent mechanism.

2. This document, initially adopted at the forty-seventh meeting of the Board, addresses the mandate of the CMP. It is continually updated to reflect the different classes of decisions and the types of documents issued by the Board.

1.2. Objective

3. The objective of this document is to maintain consistency, transparency and clarity within the body of decisions and documents issued by the Board, to facilitate the successful operationalization of the CDM.

2. Scope and entry into force

2.1. Scope

4. This document describes:

(a) The hierarchical relationship between decisions taken by the CMP and decisions of the Board;

(b) The different classes of decisions taken by the Board;

(c) The different document types containing these decisions;

(d) The hierarchical relationship between CDM documents;

(e) The relationship between Board decision classes and document types;

(f) The control and limitation of the documents.

2.2. Entry into force

5. The document enters into force on a date to be determined by the Board following all required reclassification of existing CDM documents.

3. Decision hierarchy between the CMP and the Board

6. The CMP is the ultimate decision-making body of the CDM. The CMP has authority over and provides guidance to the Board through the adoption of decisions, published in reports of the CMP. The decisions of the CMP outline formal expectations with respect to the CDM. They set direction and establish precedents which serve as reference for future decision-making and the basis for operationalizing the CDM. CMP decisions are treated as mandatory requirements or rules intended to ensure the successful implementation of the Kyoto Protocol.

7. The Board is the regulatory body of the CDM. Acting under the authority and guidance of the CMP, it is fully accountable to the CMP. The Board has authority over and provides guidance to the activities and processes of the CDM. All decisions taken by the Board elaborate upon and must be consistent with decisions of the CMP. Decisions of the Board taken during Board meetings are recorded in the meeting reports of the Board and their accompanying annexes, which together form the official record of the proceedings of the Board meetings. The authoritative set of documents containing regulatory decisions is published in the Rules and Reference section of the UNFCCC CDM website.

4. Board decision classes

8. Taking into account both the rule-making and rule-enforcing roles of the Board, decisions of the Board are divided into three classes:

(a) Regulatory decisions: relate to the adoption of, or revision to, CDM rules and requirements to be followed by the Board, its support structure and stakeholders. Regulatory decisions are reflected in the adoption of, or revisions to: standards, procedures, tools, guidelines and clarifications, as recorded in and/or annexed to the meeting reports of the Board;

(b) Rulings: relate to the determination of whether the actions of project participants, applicant entities (AEs), or designated operational entities (DOEs) are in compliance with the CDM rules and requirements. Rulings taken during the Board meetings are published in the main body of the meeting reports of the Board and/or as separate documents after Board meetings;

(c) Operational decisions: relate to the functioning of the Board and its support structure (panels, working groups and secretariat) and include: decisions on finance; administration; programmes of work; internal operating procedures and the establishment of supporting bodies. Operational decisions are either published within the main body of the meeting reports of the Board or reflected in the adoption of, or revision to, internal standards, procedures and guidelines, or in the publishing of information notes.

Figure 1 .     Decision classes

(img)(img)(img)(img)(img)

5. Document types

9. The body of documents developed under the direction of the Board that serve to operationalize the CDM, includes:

(a) Standards: Standards are designed to achieve a uniform approach to compliance with the CDM modalities and procedures. A standard describes mandatory levels of performance and/or provides mandatory specifications, and as such, set out the requirements against which compliance is evaluated. CDM regulatory standards include;

(i) Policy standards: A standard relating to the project cycle, accreditation, the development of methodologies or standardized baselines, or governance of the CDM (which is not a methodology or standardized baseline);

(ii) Methodologies: A baseline and monitoring methodology prescribes requirements to establish the baseline scenario, demonstrate additionality, define the project boundary and calculate and monitor emission reductions for CDM project activities and programme of activities;

(iii) Standardized Baselines: A baseline developed for a Party or a group of Parties, on a sub-national, national or group-of-countries basis, to facilitate the calculation of GHG emission reductions and removals by sinks and/or the determination of additionality for CDM project activities or programmes of activities;

(b) Procedures: A procedure contains a mandatory series of actions that must be undertaken to demonstrate in a uniform and consistent way that the Board, the secretariat, project participants, DOEs/AEs, and designated national authorities (DNAs) comply with the CDM modalities and procedures and the standards issued by the Board. Procedures contain requirements with regard to regulatory processes in the CDM project cycle and in the accreditation of operational entities, and operational processes of the Board and its support structure;

(c) Tools: A tool is a means of demonstrating (e.g. by calculating, determining, estimating, elaborating, identifying or testing) that a specific requirement in a standard or procedure is met. A standard or procedure indicates whether the use of a tool is voluntary or mandatory. A voluntary tool cannot be mandatory. CDM tools include:

(i) Policy tool: Supports or is a part of a standard or procedure relating to the project cycle, accreditation, the development of methodologies or standardized baselines, or governance of the CDM (which is not a  methodological tool);

(ii) Methodological tool: A standardized, stepwise approach to determine or establish parameters, or identify information, and/or assess or demonstrate requirements relating to, or for application in, CDM project activities or programme of activities;

(d) Guidelines: A guideline contains supplemental information such as recommended methods for satisfying requirements identified in the CDM modalities and procedures or standards and procedures issued by the Board or best practice examples. Guidelines are designed to promote a uniform approach to compliance with the applicable standards or procedures;

(e) Clarifications: A clarification is issued to alleviate confusion relating to the application of requirements in a regulatory standard or procedure. Two types of clarifications are issued by the Board:

(i) Policy clarification: A policy clarification is published as an annex to the report of a Board meeting. It does not change the scope of the requirement(s) that it is clarifying. A policy clarification is transitory in nature, pending the subsequent revision of the related policy standard or procedure which takes into account and incorporates the clarification;

(ii) Methodological clarification: A clarification issued in response to a project participant(s), DOE or other stakeholder wishing to seek clarification on a methodology, standardized baseline, or a methodological tool. A methodological clarification is issued in accordance with the relevant procedure;[1]

(f) Information notes: An information note contains factual and/or analytical information on a particular subject matter relating to the CDM rules and requirements, rulings of the Board (that is, the reasons for the decision), or the functioning of the Board and its support structure. Information notes do not contain requirements and may be published as annexes to the Board meeting annotated agendas or reports, or annexes to the panel or working group reports, and/or directly on the UNFCCC CDM website in cases where the secretariat is mandated to produce such notes.

(g) Forms: Forms are used to capture data or information required in the CDM processes. A form contains pre-defined fields to be filled in by project participants, AEs/DOEs or DNAs. Completing and submitting forms is part of a series of actions (how to), required by the CDM modalities and procedures, or a standard or procedure issued by the Board. Forms are published directly on the UNFCCC CDM website; and

(h) Glossaries: A glossary is an alphabetical list of terms relating to the CDM issued by the Board to facilitate a common understanding of terminology used in Board documentation.

(i)

Figure 2 .     Hierarchy of document types

(img)


Tier 1 –  Kyoto protocol (KP) is supreme text, mandatory; CMP decisions: contain, inter alia, requests, rules and requirements; rules and requirements, e.g. CDM modalities and procedures are mandatory

Tier 2 –  CDM standards, procedures and clarifications: contain mandatory requirements (policy clarifications are subsequently incorporated into relevant standard or procedure); subordinate to tier 1

Tier 3 –  CDM tools:  the relevant standard or procedure indicates whether the tool is voluntary or mandatory; subordinate to tier 1

Tier 4  –  CDM guidelines and supplementary documents: contain non-mandatory, supplemental information; subordinate to tier 1, tier 2 and tier 3

6. Board decision classes and document types

Figure 3 .     Relationship between decision classes and document types

(img)

7. Control and limitation of documents issued by the Board

10. When considering issuing a new document or revising an existing document, the Board keeps in mind the priority to consolidate, streamline and ensure consistency of all of its documentation.

11. Documents issued by the Board, with the exception of methodologies and methodological tools, can be amended as described below:

(a) Substantive revision: When substantive changes are made to a document, the document is replaced with a new document version and issued with a new primary version number;

Example: Version 2.0 of a document is replaced by Version 3.0, where the number “3” indicates a substantive change to the information contained in the document.

(b) Corrective or editorial revisions: Corrections or editorial changes do not constitute a substantive revision of the document. When corrections or editorial changes are made to a document, the document is re-issued under the same primary version number;

Example: Version 2.0 of a document is re-issued as Version 2.1, where the number “1” indicates a revision due to corrections or editorial changes.

(c) Withdrawal: Documents are withdrawn from active circulation when the information they contain is no longer applicable, relevant, or correct.

12. To increase transparency and ensure that users are aware of the latest versions of the Board’s regulatory documentation:

13. The version containing substantive changes, with the exception of forms, will be recorded in and annexed to the meeting report of the Board, and published on the UNFCCC CDM website. The latest version of the document becomes effective, unless otherwise stated in the meeting report or in the document itself, on the date of publication of the meeting report in which the document was revised;

14. The version containing changes of a corrective or editorial nature will be published on the UNFCCC CDM website and will become applicable on the date of publication. Documents having undergone corrective or editorial revisions will be noted in the next meeting report of the Board. Unless otherwise stated in the revised document, a grace period will apply between the date of publication of the version containing the corrective or editorial changes on the UNFCCC CDM website and the official notification of the corrective or editorial revision in the next meeting report of the Board;

15. Substantive, corrective or editorial revisions to forms may be made and published by the secretariat on the UNFCCC CDM website at any time. The latest version of a form will become applicable on the date of publication. The revision of the form will be noted in the next meeting report of the Board. A grace period will apply between the date of publication of the revised form on the UNFCCC CDM website and the official notification of the revision in the next meeting report of the Board.

16. Stakeholders are encouraged to regularly review the Rules and Reference section of the UNFCCC CDM website to ensure that they have the latest versions of documents, especially for forms that are required as part of a submission process in the CDM project cycle.

17. Each published Board document includes on its last page a “Document information” or “History of Document” box which contains contextual information, including the nature and date of changes made to the document. Readers should routinely consult this information when making use of a document.

- - - - -

Document information

Version

Date

Description

05.0

21 February 2014

EB 77, Annex 3

Revision to:

· Update the document to reflect recent regulatory documents approved by the Board, including standardized baselines and a voluntary tool;

· Update the hierarchy diagram to more clearly illustrate the hierarchical nature of CDM documents;

· Simplify the description of document types and more clearly illustrate the link between document types and Board decision classes;

· Generally improve consistency of terms and language used in the document.

04.0

11 May 2012

EB67, Annex 4. This revision:

· Includes a background and scope section to improve the understanding of the document;

· Separates out and expands the sections on decision classes and document types to cover internal operational procedures and instructions that relate to the functioning of the regulatory body, its supporting panels and working groups and the secretariat.

03.2

13 June 2011

Editorial change to remove the word “Draft” in title.

03.1

6 June 2011

Editorial changes to align headings and re-number subheadings appropriately.

03

EB 61, Annex 25
3 June 2011

This revision:

· Improves readability based on questions from stakeholders;

· Updates the document in light of revised procedures and clarifies the difference between editorial revisions and substantive revisions to documents and the applicability conditions of when revised documents come into effect.

02

EB 53, Annex 38
26 March 2010

Changes were made to tighten up definitions, remove unused document types and combine the decision hierarchy and the different document types, issued by the Board, into one document. This document replaces CDM Executive Board Decision Framework: Decision Hierarchy and Definitions (EB 47 Report, Annex 61) and incorporates the information contained in Definition of document types issued by the Board (EB 49 Report, Annex 31), and thus replaces this document as well.

01

EB 47, Annex 61
28 May 2009

Initial adoption.

Decision Class: Operational
Document Type: Information note
Business Function: Governance
Keywords: management of official documentation, transparency



[1] For example: “Procedure: Development, revision and clarification of baseline and monitoring methodologies and methodological tools.