What has happened to the DOEs, what happened to your due diligence before taking such projects. But I forgot here the DOE is owned by EKI, so they are obliged to take such projects. IF Applus spain office is still working, then they can check that 3 of the bundles were already a part of the another project which is at RFR stage. Mr. Ritesh at TQC will be aware of this, but still would keep helping EKI, but they are fools, anyone can easily check this. CDM mechanism is very transparent but such DOEs have made it corrupt. 
Applus  headoffice to check the following; 
The start date of those bundle mentioned in the current PDD and the old ones for all the bundles. 
The CDM notification dates mentioned in the old PDD and this one. Plus EKi is expert in making fraud emails. The DOE can always check and cross check with emails directly from UNFCCC. I am asking Applus to check the prior notification from CDM EB, things will be clear. CDM EB will send those emails of the date mentioned in the PDD. You will come to know that no such project was mentioned in those emails. 
After this event I am sure Applus head office will know what EKI is and I hope they will not work for such fraud companies in future. Their Indian counterpart is a hand in glove and is owned by EKI. 
Even after this if Applus continues to work with EKI then UNFCCC should suspend this DOE as it would be clear that EKI has intentionally submitted fraud information. 
1.	EKI is known in the market as not to conduct the stakeholders meeting. That’s the reason they never give any ad in public or they do not submit any photographs as they have never conducted any stakeholder meeting. Even the DOE does not go at the site as TQC is associated with EKI and EKI is the co owner of the company. Can Applus check the photos of the stakeholder meeting? 
2.	Also the dates and name of person mentioned in the old PDD and the current webhosted PDD  is different. 
3.	Further for LSC meeting the DNA is to be invited, if an actual meeting was carried out, that too by the CDM consultant as mentioned in the PDD, then they should be aware of the requirement. So have they invited the DNA for the stakeholder meeting. Can the DOE verify it with the DNA. Can Applus Spain team verify with DNA and not rely on the Indian counterpart as they will never do it diligently. 
4.	Can EKI submit any photographs of  its consultant being present or in case the meeting was carried out. Can the DOE go and meet the same persons? I am sure they will now start making photographs. Can Applus collect the photos of the LSC before sending their auditor? I am sure EKi will give all the reasons that they do not have photos, that to in this age, where mobile camera are available with everyone. But they intentionally will not give any photos as there was no meeting carried out. The DOE also supports them. 
5.	Further if the CDM consultant was appointed before the PO, why has that not been considered as start date? 
6.	To verify how fraud the company EKI is… you may check http://www.nhpcindia.com/BannedFirmListEng.htm they are blacklisted by a PSU because of all fraud things that they do. 
7.	DOE Applus also to check its credibility as their Indian partner TQC is an holding company of EKI’s partners. Which is a big conflict of interest. This is the reason why majority of the projects by TQC is from EKI. How applus has mitigiated the risk from same company is a mystery.  
8.	Further what is this REXchange P (118). Has the DOE bothered to check the status of the company or this is just a gimmick by EKI. Everyone knows REXchange is a name used by Manish dabkara, with no legal status. Has the DOE checked the company documents, its registration or bank account or any legal status? Or they just accept everything that EKI gives them?

I will say again, check the prior notification with CDM EB. 

1. During the project visit of APPLUS team in India, Natalia have taken bribe from the PP’s and their Partner in India. APPLUS team have not spent even 10 minutes in site, it seems that they came here for the Picnic & leisure visit over LGAI funds. 
2. APPLUS have done PoA recently, they have not followed any ethical practices in the PoA at Asia. They are known to violate the norms set by the EB.
3. APPLUS have many auditor in china, all the Auditor have conflict of interest with either with Client or consultant. Why Applus is having maximum projects in China and not in other country ?
4. This EKI energy known to misuse DOE & is giving major projects to EPIC, Applus and PJR DoE in india, if APPLUS team and UNFCCC investigate  you will find that Reetesh Jain have some shareholding in those two company EPIC & PJR also.
5. This Manish Dabkara is the batchmate of Vivek Ahirwar, and this vivek ahirwar is doing projects of Manish Dabkara via TQC, and Reetesh jain is also happens to be batchmate of the both.
6. If You need any further information & documentary evidence please contact us on martin.hams1956@gmail.com 
and mobile number +91 93-25-446292.