EKI is a company which has well known for all the wrong reasons. They are corrupt and fraud. 
1.	The start date of project seems confusing, there are four offer letter dates for four bundles, but CDM notification is only two and start date for rest 3 bundle is not provided EKI started its manipulation? DOE to check with the originals. 
2.	EKI is known in the market as not to conduct the stakeholders meeting. That’s the reason they never give any ad in public or they do not submit any photographs as they have never conducted any stakeholder meeting. Even the DOE does not go at the site as TQC is associated with EKI and EKI is the co owner of the company. Can Applus check the photos of the stakeholder meeting? 
3.	Further for LSC meeting the DNA is to be invited, if an actual meeting was carried out, that too by the CDM consultant as mentioned in the PDD, then they should be aware of the requirement. So have they invited the DNA for the stakeholder meeting. Can the DOE verify it with the DNA. Can Applus Spain team verify with DNA and not rely on the Indian counterpart as they will never do it diligently. 
4.	Can EKI submit any photographs of  its consultant being present or in case the meeting was carried out. Can the DOE go and meet the same persons? I am sure they will now start making photographs. Can Applus collect the photos of the LSC before sending their auditor? I am sure EKi will give all the reasons that they do not have photos, that to in this age, where mobile camera are available with everyone. But they intentionally will not give any photos as there was no meeting carried out. The DOE also supports them. 
5.	Further if the CDM consultant was appointed before the PO, why has that not been considered as start date? 
6.	The name of the consultant mentioned in the PDD was not even an employee of EKI at that date, the same can be checked from his linked in page it says November is the month when he joined EKI. I am sure that will be changed now. If the DOE and UNFCCC wants I have a screen shot as a proof. But I am sure the DOE will help them find a solution. Even the linked in page of EKI itself can show you the team members were totally different at that time. The DOE both Indian party of Applus as well as Spain is aware of this (the old team members and new ones). This clearly shows LSC meeting was not carried out. 
7.	To verify how fraud the company EKI is… you may check http://www.nhpcindia.com/BannedFirmListEng.htm they are blacklisted by a PSU because of all fraud things that they do. 
8.	DOE Applus also to check its credibility as their Indian partner TQC is an holding company of EKI’s partners. Which is a big conflict of interest. This is the reason why majority of the projects by TQC is from EKI. How applus has mitigiated the risk from same company is a mystery.  
9.	Further what is this REXchange P (99). Has the DOE bothered to check the status of the company or this is just a gimmick by EKI. Everyone knows REXchange is a name used by Manish dabkara, with no legal status. Has the DOE checked the company documents, its registration or bank account or any legal status? Or they just accept everything that EKI gives them?

UN to check that such fraud projects are stopped. If further proof required, let me know. 
Regards, 
Naveen

1. During the project visit of APPLUS team in India, Natalia have taken bribe from the PP’s and their Partner in India. APPLUS team have not spent even 10 minutes in site, it seems that they came here for the Picnic & leisure visit over LGAI funds. 
2. APPLUS have done PoA recently, they have not followed any ethical practices in the PoA at Asia. They are known to violate the norms set by the EB.
3. APPLUS have many auditor in china, all the Auditor have conflict of interest with either with Client or consultant. Why Applus is having maximum projects in China and not in other country ?
4. This EKI energy known to misuse DOE & is giving major projects to EPIC, Applus and PJR DoE in india, if APPLUS team and UNFCCC investigate  you will find that Reetesh Jain have some shareholding in those two company EPIC & PJR also.
5. This Manish Dabkara is the batchmate of Vivek Ahirwar, and this vivek ahirwar is doing projects of Manish Dabkara via TQC, and Reetesh jain is also happens to be batchmate of the both.
6. If You need any further information & documentary evidence please contact us on martin.hams1956@gmail.com 
and mobile number +91 93-25-446292.