15 MW Wind Power Project by RSPL Ltd (EKIESL-CDM-May-16-04)
[]
Host party(ies) India
Methodology(ies) AMS-I.D. ver. 18
Standardised Baselines N/A
Estimated annual reductions* 29,823
Proposed start date of PA 21 Oct 15
Start date of first crediting period. 31 Aug 16
Length of first crediting period. 7 years
DOE/AE LGAI Technological Center, S.A.
Period for comments 19 May 16 - 17 Jun 16 (23:59:59 GMT)
PP(s) for which DOE have a contractual obligation RSPL Limited
The operational/applicant entity working on this project has decided to make the Project Design Document (PDD) publicly available directly on the UNFCCC CDM website.
PDD PDD (860 KB)
Local stakeholder consultation report: N/A
Impact assessment summary: N/A
Submission of comments to the DOE/AE Compilation of submitted inputs: 
EKI is a company which has well known for all the wrong reasons. They are corrupt and fraud. 
1.	The start date of project seems confusing, there are two offer letter dates for two bundles, but CDM notification is only one and start date for two bundle is not provided. Offer letter is dated august 2015 and PO is in December? This long amount of time or EKI started its manipulation? DOE to check with the originals. 
2.	EKI is known in the market as not to conduct the stakeholders meeting. That’s the reason they never give any ad in public or they do not submit any photographs as they have never conducted any stakeholder meeting. Even the DOE does not go at the site as TQC is associated with EKI and EKI is the co owner of the company. Can Applus check the photos of the stakeholder meeting? 
3.	Further for LSC meeting the DNA is to be invited, if an actual meeting was carried out, that too by the CDM consultant as mentioned in the PDD, then they should be aware of the requirement. So have they invited the DNA for the stakeholder meeting. Can the DOE verify it with the DNA. Can Applus Spain team verify with DNA and not rely on the Indian counterpart as they will never do it diligently. 
4.	Can EKI submit any photographs of  its consultant being present or in case the meeting was carried out. Can the DOE go and meet the same persons? I am sure they will now start making photographs. Can Applus collect the photos of the LSC before sending their auditor? I am sure EKi will give all the reasons that they do not have photos, that to in this age, where mobile camera are available with everyone. But they intentionally will not give any photos as there was no meeting carried out. The DOE also supports them. 
5.	Further if the CDM consultant was appointed before the PO, why has that not been considered as start date? 
6.	The name of the consultant mentioned in the PDD was not even an employee of EKI at that date, the same can be checked from his linked in page it says November is the month when he joined EKI. I am sure that will be changed now. If the DOE and UNFCCC wants I have a screen shot as a proof. But I am sure the DOE will help them find a solution. 
7.	To verify how fraud the company EKI is… you may check http://www.nhpcindia.com/BannedFirmListEng.htm they are blacklisted by a PSU because of all fraud things that they do. 
8.	DOE Applus also to check its credibility as their Indian partner TQC is an holding company of EKI’s partners. Which is a big conflict of interest. This is the reason why majority of the projects by TQC is from EKI. How applus has mitigiated the risk from same company is a mystery.  

The DOE and UNFCCC can get the screenshot and any clarifications at naveenenvironment12@gmail.com
Submitted by: Naveen Dhingra

The comment period is over.
* Emission reductions in metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent per annum that are based on the estimates provided by the project participants in unvalidated PDDs