21:36 19 Apr 24
Info Report Check
Submission incomplete:
1: Scope: The verification report does not describe the implementation status of the project. (For project activities that consist of more than one site, the report shall clearly describe the status of implementation and starting date of operation for each site. For CDM project activities with phased implementation, the report shall state the progress of the proposed CDM project activity achieved in each phase under verification). (VVM v.1.2 para 198 (a)).
Issue: the verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has verified the implementation of the 2nd phase of the project activity and final plant capacity of 60t/d, which is not consistent with the PDD description envisaging a final plant capacity of 50t/d.
2: Scope: The verification report does not state how the DOE verified the information flow for the listed parameters. (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue 1: paragraph 14 of the applied methodology requires the conduction of in situ verification of the proper soil application of the compost to ensure aerobic conditions for further decay. The verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has verified that this requirement is met.
Issue 2: with regard to the parameter "p_n,j,y - Weight fraction of waste type j in the sample n collected during period y", the registered monitoring plan requires that the size and frequency of sampling provides statistically significant data with a maximum uncertainty range of 20% at a 95% confidence level. The verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has verified that this requirement is met.
3: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has determined if the default values/emission factors used in the emission calculations and as listed in section D.1 of the Monitoring Report have been justified and correctly applied.
1: Scope: The verification report does not describe the implementation status of the project. (For project activities that consist of more than one site, the report shall clearly describe the status of implementation and starting date of operation for each site. For CDM project activities with phased implementation, the report shall state the progress of the proposed CDM project activity achieved in each phase under verification). (VVM v.1.2 para 198 (a)).
Issue: the verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has verified the implementation of the 2nd phase of the project activity and final plant capacity of 60t/d, which is not consistent with the PDD description envisaging a final plant capacity of 50t/d.
2: Scope: The verification report does not state how the DOE verified the information flow for the listed parameters. (VVM v.1.2 para 206)
Issue 1: paragraph 14 of the applied methodology requires the conduction of in situ verification of the proper soil application of the compost to ensure aerobic conditions for further decay. The verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has verified that this requirement is met.
Issue 2: with regard to the parameter "p_n,j,y - Weight fraction of waste type j in the sample n collected during period y", the registered monitoring plan requires that the size and frequency of sampling provides statistically significant data with a maximum uncertainty range of 20% at a 95% confidence level. The verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has verified that this requirement is met.
3: Scope: The verification report does not determine if the assumptions used in emission calculations have been justified and/or emission factors, default values and other reference values have been correctly applied. (VVM v.1.2 para 208 (d) & (e))
Issue: The verification report does not contain information on how the DOE has determined if the default values/emission factors used in the emission calculations and as listed in section D.1 of the Monitoring Report have been justified and correctly applied.
Offset now: visit the United Nations Carbon Offset Platform
Connect with us: